-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Rework as the Linked Data Formats WG #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
ca9cf57
83c1d62
54036e3
ce2329a
14a16eb
d852a33
f8ec6c3
8e11f40
b556bbe
6a0f149
963f2e3
0f5d94b
384d27e
c92ebf5
da62ffc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||||||||||||
<head> | ||||||||||||||
<meta charset="utf-8"> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<title>JSON-LD Working Group Charter</title> | ||||||||||||||
<title>Linked Data Formats Working Group Charter</title> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.w3.org/2005/10/w3cdoc.css" type="text/css" media="screen"> | ||||||||||||||
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.w3.org/OldGuide/pubrules-style.css"> | ||||||||||||||
|
@@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<main> | ||||||||||||||
<h1 id="title"><i class=todo>DRAFT</i> JSON-LD Working Group Charter</h1> | ||||||||||||||
<h1 id="title"><i class=todo>DRAFT</i> Linked Data Formats Working Group Charter</h1> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<p class="mission">The <strong>mission</strong> of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld">JSON-LD Working Group</a> is to maintain and extend the <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld/publications">family of JSON-LD 1.1 Recommendations</a> and related Working Group Notes.</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p class="mission">The <strong>mission</strong> of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld">Linked Data Formats Working Group</a> is to extend the <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld/publications">family of JSON-LD Recommendations</a> to provide Linked Data expressions in a range of formats and sizes.</p> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<div class="noprint"> | ||||||||||||||
<p class="join"><a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld/join">Join the JSON-LD Working Group.</a></p> | ||||||||||||||
<p class="join"><a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld/join">Join the Linked Data Formats Working Group.</a></p> | ||||||||||||||
</div> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<p class=todo style="padding: 0.5ex; border: 1px solid green"> | ||||||||||||||
|
@@ -144,9 +144,26 @@ <h1 id="title"><i class=todo>DRAFT</i> JSON-LD Working Group Charter</h1> | |||||||||||||
<div id="background" class="background"> | ||||||||||||||
<h2>Motivation and Background</h2> | ||||||||||||||
<p> | ||||||||||||||
JSON-LD (JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data) is a method of encoding linked data using JSON. | ||||||||||||||
The encoding is used used mostly for search engine optimization activities but also for applications such as | ||||||||||||||
biomedical informatics, and representing provenance information. | ||||||||||||||
JSON-LD (JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data) is a widely used method of encoding Linked Data using JSON. | ||||||||||||||
Use of JSON-LD has grown and expanded over the last decade (since it's first publication as a | ||||||||||||||
<a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api1/">W3C Recommendation in 2014</a>). | ||||||||||||||
JSON-LD remains a popular choice for ecoding <abbr title="Seach Engine Optimization">SEO</abbr>-focused | ||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||
structured data in Web pages. JSON-LD has also become a foundational format for social media (ActivityStreams), | ||||||||||||||
Internet of Things data (Web of Things Description), Verifiable Credentials, and Software Bill of Materials (SPDX). | ||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+151
to
+152
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It would be good to link to these citations. |
||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p>This growth in the applied use of JSON-LD has resulted in community interest in additional expressions of | ||||||||||||||
JSON-LD's underlying Linked Data expression into other formats. YAML-LD has been created by the | ||||||||||||||
BigBlueHat marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||
<a href="https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/">JSON for Linking Data Community Group</a> for easing human | ||||||||||||||
authoring and providing a clearer path for using Linked Data applied to popular YAML-based documents such as | ||||||||||||||
infrastructure as code, static site front matter, and API documentation formats. Additionally, a need has | ||||||||||||||
arised in the Verifiable Credentials space for providing a more compressed expression of JSON-LD, and work on | ||||||||||||||
CBOR-LD was begun in the JSON-LD CG. | ||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+158
to
+160
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p> | ||||||||||||||
The hope of this new more inclusively focused Linked Data Formats WG is to meet the demand of the broader | ||||||||||||||
JSON-LD community by strengthening the foundational JSON-LD specifications and aligning it with the latest | ||||||||||||||
RDF 1.2 specifications, growing the family of Linked Data formats which orbit around the JSON-LD data model, | ||||||||||||||
and specify additional processing and context retrieval methods for greater clarity and stability. | ||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
</div> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
@@ -164,7 +181,7 @@ <h2>Scope</h2> | |||||||||||||
It will also develop new Recommendation Track deliverables, based on work incubated by the <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/">JSON for Linking Data Community Group</a>, | ||||||||||||||
specifying the use of JSON-LD algorithms with similar formats (YAML, CBOR, and more). | ||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p>The Working group is expected to coordinate with the <a href='https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/'>JSON for Linking Data Community Group</a> on consensus-based proposals related to content changes for the JSON-LD Working Group Deliverables. The Chairs of this group may choose to reject proposals that are incompatible with this Charter.</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p>The Working group is expected to coordinate with the <a href='https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/'>JSON for Linking Data Community Group</a> on consensus-based proposals related to content changes for the Linked Data Formats Working Group Deliverables. The Chairs of this group may choose to reject proposals that are incompatible with this Charter.</p> | ||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I like the Should the Community Group also be renamed? Does it somehow relate to the rechartering, and renaming, of the Working Group? |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<section id="section-feature-updates"> | ||||||||||||||
<h3 id="in-scope">In Scope</h3> | ||||||||||||||
|
@@ -422,7 +439,7 @@ <h2>Coordination</h2> | |||||||||||||
<h3 id="w3c-coordination">W3C Groups</h3> | ||||||||||||||
<dl> | ||||||||||||||
<dt><a href='https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/'>JSON for Linking Data Community Group</a></dt> | ||||||||||||||
<dd>As mentioned in the scope section, the Working group is expected to coordinate with this Community Group on consensus-based proposals related to content changes for the JSON-LD Working Group Deliverables. The Chairs of this group may choose to reject proposals that are incompatible with this Charter.</dd> | ||||||||||||||
<dd>As mentioned in the scope section, the Working group is expected to coordinate with this Community Group on consensus-based proposals related to content changes for the Linked Data Formats Working Group Deliverables. The Chairs of this group may choose to reject proposals that are incompatible with this Charter.</dd> | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
<dt><a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/dc">Verifiable Credentials Working Group</a></dt> | ||||||||||||||
<dd>Coordination on named graph indexing and other concerns regarding support for normalization and digital signatures.</dd> | ||||||||||||||
|
@@ -483,10 +500,10 @@ <h2> | |||||||||||||
The meetings themselves are not open to public participation, however. | ||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p> | ||||||||||||||
Information about the group (including details about deliverables, issues, actions, status, participants, and meetings) will be available from the <a href="">JSON-LD Working Group home page.</a> | ||||||||||||||
Information about the group (including details about deliverables, issues, actions, status, participants, and meetings) will be available from the <a href="">Linked Data Formats Working Group home page.</a> | ||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p> | ||||||||||||||
Most JSON-LD Working Group teleconferences will focus on discussion of particular specifications, and will be conducted on an as-needed basis. | ||||||||||||||
Most Linked Data Formats Working Group teleconferences will focus on discussion of particular specifications, and will be conducted on an as-needed basis. | ||||||||||||||
</p> | ||||||||||||||
<p> | ||||||||||||||
This group primarily conducts its technical work on <a id="public-github" href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/json-ld/tools">GitHub issues</a>. | ||||||||||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed during our last meeting, I believe that "JSON-LD" should still appear in the name of the WG. @BigBlueHat proposed "JSON-LD data formats" (or simply "JSON-LD formats", as D alteady means "data" 😉 )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upon first reading the name "Linked Data Formats", I thought the goal was also to bring other formats such as Turtle, RDF/XML, and so on under the scope of this WG. But this doesn't seem to be the cause. I would suspect similar confusion to be raised outside of the WG.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What brings the these formats under the same roof is the fact that these formats add an rdf (a.k.a. linked data) layer on top of an existing and widespread data syntax. On could argue that this is the case of rdf/xml, and that would be true, except that people hardly care about that format anyway.
I am sure someone will find a nice term for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps something along the direction of Embedded Linked Data Formats?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We discussed this on the last call. We need to find a good name, but basically it’s appropriate for polyglot formats that can be reduced to some variation of our internal representation. This explicitly does not include other established RDF formats.
“Embedded” is a loaded term, and also describes how scripts may be embedded in HTML using the script element.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this is the core criteria, and that's one of my argument for keeping JSON-LD in the name (in addition to showing continuity and avoiding confusion).