Add Swift Package Registry support#15
Merged
albertodebortoli merged 3 commits intomainfrom Jun 9, 2025
Merged
Conversation
84f0c59 to
ab98ddd
Compare
ab98ddd to
62fe9c0
Compare
akuzminskyi
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
| @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | |||
| // swift-tools-version: 6.0 | |||
victor-sarda
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These changes allow the generation of
Package.swiftfiles when using a Swift Registry.The dependency in the dependencies file should have an
identifiervalue. Theurlvalue is not needed when using a registry but it's kept for backward compatibility (it would also come handy for documentation purposes to re).The Spec file will have to specify which remote dependency is referenced from the target dependencies to resolve the correct value for the package parameter (the identifier) in the product definition (
.product(name: "RemoteDependency", package: "acme.RemoteDependency")). We cannot just rely on the name value since it might differ from what used in the dependencies file, as expressed in the test using the_SDKsuffix.Reflecting as follows in the
Package.swiftfile: