operator dell-csm-operator (1.10.0)

[chaganti-rajitha]

Thanks submitting your Operator. Please check below list before you create your Pull Request.

New Submissions

• Are you familiar with our contribution guidelines?
• Have you packaged and deployed your Operator for Operator Framework?
• Have you tested your Operator with all Custom Resource Definitions?
• Have you tested your Operator in all supported installation modes?
• Have you considered whether you want use semantic versioning order?
• Is your submission signed?
• Is operator icon set?

Updates to existing Operators

• Did you create a ci.yaml file according to the update instructions?
• Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property if you chose replaces-mode via the updateGraph property in ci.yaml?
• Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml or annotations.yaml ?
• Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
• Is your submission signed?

Your submission should not

• Modify more than one operator
• Modify an Operator you don't own
• Rename an operator - please remove and add with a different name instead
• Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
• Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

• Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
• Valid category name¹
• One of the pre-defined capability levels²
• Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
• Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
• A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

¹ If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need

² For more information see here

[github-actions]

Dear @chaganti-rajitha,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (dell-csm-operator/1.10.0) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.36.0 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type	Message
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: this bundle is using APIs which were deprecated and removed in v1.25. More info: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#v1-25. Migrate the API(s) for endpointslices: (["ClusterServiceVersion.Spec.InstallStrategy.StrategySpec.ClusterPermissions[0].Rules[0]" "ClusterServiceVersion.Spec.InstallStrategy.StrategySpec.ClusterPermissions[0].Rules[46]"])
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: unable to find the resource requests for the container: (kube-rbac-proxy). It is recommended to ensure the resource request for CPU and Memory. Be aware that for some clusters configurations it is required to specify requests or limits for those values. Otherwise, the system or quota may reject Pod creation. More info: https://master.sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/best-practices/managing-resources/
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: CSV contains permissions to create CRD. An Operator shouldn't deploy or manage other operators (such patterns are known as meta or super operators or include CRDs in its Operands). It's the Operator Lifecycle Manager's job to manage the deployment and lifecycle of operators. Please, review the design of your solution and if you should not be using Dependency Resolution from OLM instead. More info: https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/best-practices/common-recommendation/

[github-actions]

Dear @chaganti-rajitha,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (dell-csm-operator/1.10.0) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.36.0 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type	Message
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: this bundle is using APIs which were deprecated and removed in v1.25. More info: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#v1-25. Migrate the API(s) for endpointslices: (["ClusterServiceVersion.Spec.InstallStrategy.StrategySpec.ClusterPermissions[0].Rules[0]" "ClusterServiceVersion.Spec.InstallStrategy.StrategySpec.ClusterPermissions[0].Rules[46]"])
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: unable to find the resource requests for the container: (kube-rbac-proxy). It is recommended to ensure the resource request for CPU and Memory. Be aware that for some clusters configurations it is required to specify requests or limits for those values. Otherwise, the system or quota may reject Pod creation. More info: https://master.sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/best-practices/managing-resources/
⚠️	Value dell-csm-operator.v1.10.0: CSV contains permissions to create CRD. An Operator shouldn't deploy or manage other operators (such patterns are known as meta or super operators or include CRDs in its Operands). It's the Operator Lifecycle Manager's job to manage the deployment and lifecycle of operators. Please, review the design of your solution and if you should not be using Dependency Resolution from OLM instead. More info: https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/best-practices/common-recommendation/

[github-actions]

@donatwork,@rajendraindukuri,@panigs7 , please approve as you are original reviewer(s).

• To add more contributors to ci.yaml follow instruction here.
• To approve follow instruction here

[framework-automation]

/merge possible

[framework-automation]

/merge possible

[github-actions]

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

[github-actions]

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

[framework-automation]

/merge possible

[framework-automation]

/merge possible

[github-actions]

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

[github-actions]

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

[rajendraindukuri]

/approve

[chaganti-rajitha]

Hi @tomasbakk and @haripate , we are seeing that it requires "authorized-changes" label to be added to this PR. Please help merging this PR.

[rajendraindukuri]

/authorized-changes

[chaganti-rajitha]

Gentle Reminder.

Hi @tomasbakk and @haripate , we are seeing that it requires "authorized-changes" label to be added to this PR. Please help merging this PR.

[framework-automation]

/merge possible