fix(deps): update micromatch to 4.0.8

[AftAb-25]

Fixed #159

Upgraded micromatch to version 4.0.8 or later to address security concerns. This was achieved by adding a pnpm override in the root ui/package.json.

[karmada-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign samzong for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @AftAb-25, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a security concern by upgrading the micromatch dependency to version 4.0.8. The update is enforced through a pnpm override mechanism, ensuring that all parts of the project utilize the secure version of the library. This change primarily focuses on enhancing the project's security posture by mitigating known vulnerabilities associated with older micromatch versions.

Highlights

• Security Update: The micromatch dependency has been upgraded to version 4.0.8 or later to resolve identified security vulnerabilities, as indicated by the fix for issue Update dependencies version  #159.
• Dependency Override Implementation: A pnpm override has been explicitly added in the ui/package.json file to enforce the use of micromatch version 4.0.8 or newer across the project's dependencies.
• Lockfile Synchronization: The ui/pnpm-lock.yaml file has been updated to reflect the new micromatch override, ensuring consistent dependency resolution and removing references to the older, vulnerable version.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses the security vulnerability in micromatch by upgrading it to version 4.0.8 using a pnpm override. The changes are consistent across package.json and the lock file. I have one suggestion to improve the long-term stability of this override by making the version range more restrictive.