Skip to content

Conversation

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: fix the incorrect reference to the memlock_rlim variable in the comment.
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: e758657
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: ff88079
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: f9db3a3
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 8842732
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 23f852d
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

…he comment.

The variable "memlock_rlim_max" referenced in the comment does not exist.
I think that the author probably meant the variable "memlock_rlim". So,
correct it.

Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot deleted the series/1016032=>bpf-next branch October 28, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant