Skip to content

Conversation

@kevinjqliu
Copy link
Owner

Rationale for this change

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@kevinjqliu
Copy link
Owner Author

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevinjqliu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the FsspecFileIO in pyiceberg to improve how Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) configurations are handled. It specifically addresses an issue where ADLS account names and SAS tokens were not correctly extracted from properties when a network location was present in the URI. The changes also generalize the filesystem retrieval mechanism to pass the netloc (network location) from the URI to the underlying filesystem, allowing for more granular configuration based on the storage endpoint.

Highlights

  • Improved ADLS Configuration: The _adls function now correctly parses and applies ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME and ADLS_SAS_TOKEN from connection properties, especially when derived from the URI's network location, resolving a known issue.
  • Enhanced Filesystem Property Handling: The _get_fs method in FsspecFileIO has been updated to accept and pass the netloc (network location) from the URI to the filesystem constructor, enabling more precise filesystem initialization.
  • Type Hinting Refinement: The Optional type hint has been introduced for the new netloc parameter, improving code clarity and maintainability.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the ADLS filesystem initialization to correctly handle per-account SAS tokens by using the netloc from the file URI. The overall approach is sound and improves the ADLS integration. However, the changes lack unit tests to verify the new authentication logic, which is a critical gap. I've provided a comment highlighting the need for tests and another with a suggestion to simplify the implementation.

)


def _adls(properties: Properties) -> AbstractFileSystem:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This new logic for ADLS authentication is a great improvement. However, it is not covered by any unit tests. Please add tests to ensure this works as expected and to prevent future regressions. A unit test could mock adlfs.AzureBlobFileSystem and verify it's called with the correct account_name and sas_token when per-account credentials are provided in the properties.

Comment on lines +199 to +209
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
else:
account_uri = None

if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]

# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This logic can be slightly simplified by nesting the checks inside the if netloc := ... block. This avoids the need for the else clause and checking for account_uri being non-None in subsequent if statements, making the code more concise and readable.

Suggested change
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
else:
account_uri = None
if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]
# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME):
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]
# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN):
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces significant improvements to the Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) integration by correctly handling per-account credentials, specifically SAS tokens. The changes involve passing the netloc from file URIs down to the filesystem factory, allowing for proper credential resolution for the specific account being accessed. A key enhancement is the copying of properties before they are used to initialize a filesystem, which prevents state leakage and resolves a potential bug. Overall, these changes make the ADLS support more robust and correct. I have one suggestion to slightly refactor a section of the new logic in the _adls function to improve its clarity and maintainability.

Comment on lines +199 to +209
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
else:
account_uri = None

if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]

# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This block of code can be refactored for better readability. By first determining account_uri and then using a single conditional block, you can avoid the else statement and repeated and account_uri checks. This streamlines the logic and makes it easier to follow.

Suggested change
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
else:
account_uri = None
if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]
# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN) and account_uri:
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")
account_uri = None
if netloc := properties.get("netloc"):
account_uri = netloc.split("@")[-1]
if account_uri:
if not properties.get(ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME):
properties[ADLS_ACCOUNT_NAME] = account_uri.split(".")[0]
# Fixes https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1146
if not properties.get(ADLS_SAS_TOKEN):
properties[ADLS_SAS_TOKEN] = properties.get(f"{ADLS_SAS_TOKEN}.{account_uri}")

@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu closed this Aug 23, 2025
@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu deleted the kevinjqliu/adls branch August 23, 2025 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants