Skip to content

Add distribution survey results blog post#713

Merged
ahus1 merged 3 commits intokeycloak:mainfrom
mabartos:distribution-survey-results
Mar 18, 2026
Merged

Add distribution survey results blog post#713
ahus1 merged 3 commits intokeycloak:mainfrom
mabartos:distribution-survey-results

Conversation

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor

@mabartos mabartos commented Mar 13, 2026

Looks like this:

Screencast.From.2026-03-18.11-29-45.mp4

@vmuzikar @ahus1 Could you please check it? Thanks!

@mabartos mabartos requested a review from vmuzikar March 13, 2026 12:18
Copy link
Contributor

@vmuzikar vmuzikar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you.

@vmuzikar vmuzikar requested a review from ahus1 March 13, 2026 13:50
@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vmuzikar Thanks!

@ahus1 As you're aware more about the website stuff; is it ok, if I provide the iframe to the slides, right?

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahus1 We spoke with @vmuzikar and the iframe should be good for the website. However, he'd like to have a second opinion on the content of the blog post, if it's alright to have it like this. Or if you're travelling now and don't have time to check it, I can ask someone else. Thanks!

@ahus1
Copy link
Member

ahus1 commented Mar 17, 2026

@mabartos - about showing the results, I would prefer a linked PDF with a teaser image where people can click on. This is a more stable setup, and can be versioned in a simpler way.

Looking at the statement "The whole Keycloak team is aware of these results and consider it during planning the next priorities." I'd say it is quite vague. If this reflects that current state of discussion it would be at least a true statement, though the readers would hope for something more specific.

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahus1 Thanks for the review!

about showing the results, I would prefer a linked PDF with a teaser image where people can click on. This is a more stable setup, and can be versioned in a simpler way.

I can provide the PDF version to the website resource, but I kinda like the iframe view. Or can you elaborate on the teaser and clicking on it? That we'd have the image as a link (<a href) which would redirect people to download the PDF? Or what do you mean? Why do we need to have it versioned?

Looking at the statement "The whole Keycloak team is aware of these results and consider it during planning the next priorities." I'd say it is quite vague. If this reflects that current state of discussion it would be at least a true statement, though the readers would hope for something more specific.

What would you suggest?

Signed-off-by: Martin Bartoš <mabartos@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Bartoš <mabartos@redhat.com>
@mabartos mabartos force-pushed the distribution-survey-results branch from f3dfb34 to 37ca79e Compare March 18, 2026 10:30
Signed-off-by: Martin Bartoš <mabartos@redhat.com>
@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Using the PDF version inside the iframe (updated screencast in the PR description).
  • Changed text

cc: @ahus1 @vmuzikar

@ahus1
Copy link
Member

ahus1 commented Mar 18, 2026

What would you suggest?

How do the results of the survey have an effect on the Keycloak roadmap? Are we adding a Helm chart to the roadmap - either standalone, or for the Operator? Does it affect the roadmap of the Operator's features?

If there is nothing to share on the roadmap, feel free to merge it as is.

@vmuzikar
Copy link
Contributor

If there is nothing to share on the roadmap, feel free to merge it as is.

There isn't yet...

@ahus1
Copy link
Member

ahus1 commented Mar 18, 2026

There isn't yet...

ok, then let's merge as is.

@ahus1 ahus1 merged commit 593035c into keycloak:main Mar 18, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants