Skip to content

No CVEs for experimental features#722

Merged
abstractj merged 2 commits intokeycloak:mainfrom
ahus1:is-no-cves-for-experimental-features
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

No CVEs for experimental features#722
abstractj merged 2 commits intokeycloak:mainfrom
ahus1:is-no-cves-for-experimental-features

Conversation

@ahus1
Copy link
Member

@ahus1 ahus1 commented Mar 18, 2026

As discussed by the security team, this would clarify how we handle experimental features.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Schwartz <alexander.schwartz@ibm.com>
@ahus1
Copy link
Member Author

ahus1 commented Mar 18, 2026

@stianst / @abstractj / @sschu / @rmartinc - please review and approve if you agree. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@rmartinc rmartinc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ahus1! Just added a minor rewording to mention that the security handling starts with preview.

Co-authored-by: Ricardo Martin <rmartinc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Schwartz <alexander.schwartz@gmx.net>
@ahus1 ahus1 self-assigned this Mar 19, 2026
@abstractj abstractj merged commit 4ec9e85 into keycloak:main Mar 19, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants