Docs/updates to docs layout #505
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes enhance SEO and metadata handling throughout the project. The sitemap and robots.txt configurations are refined for improved search engine interaction. The documentation schema is extended with a rich Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DocsPage (Astro)
participant HeadOverride
participant Metadata (Frontmatter)
participant SEO/OG Tags
participant JSON-LD
User->>DocsPage: Requests documentation page
DocsPage->>HeadOverride: Renders with entry prop
HeadOverride->>Metadata: Extracts/merges metadata (keywords, topics, etc.)
HeadOverride->>SEO/OG Tags: Generates meta tags (SEO, Open Graph, Twitter)
HeadOverride->>JSON-LD: Generates structured data (TechArticle)
HeadOverride-->>DocsPage: Renders enhanced <head> section
DocsPage-->>User: Returns page with rich metadata
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~40 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation - BetaCodeRabbit's unit test generation is now available in Beta! Automatically generate comprehensive unit tests for your code changes, ensuring better test coverage and catching edge cases you might miss. Our AI analyzes your code structure and creates tests that follow best practices and your project's testing patterns. Learn more here, or just try it under ✨ Finishing Touches. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Deploying kinde-docs-previews with
|
| Latest commit: |
9a01771
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://823c6414.kinde-docs-previews.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://docs-updates-to-docs-layout.kinde-docs-previews.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/pages/docs-suggestions.json.ts (1)
4-4: Avoid usinganytype - define proper types for better type safetyUsing
as anyremoves type safety and could lead to runtime errors. Consider defining a proper type for the imported MDX modules.+interface MDXModule { + frontmatter: { + page_id: string; + title: string; + description?: string; + app_context?: any[]; + metadata?: { + topics?: string[]; + keywords?: string[]; + audience?: string[]; + complexity?: 'beginner' | 'intermediate' | 'advanced'; + sdk?: string[]; + languages?: string[]; + updated?: string | Date; + featured?: boolean; + deprecated?: boolean; + 'ai-summary'?: string; + }; + }; +} + - const docs = import.meta.glob("../content/docs/**/**/*.mdx", {eager: true}) as any; + const docs = import.meta.glob<MDXModule>("../content/docs/**/**/*.mdx", {eager: true});
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
public/robots.txt (1)
10-18: Consider removing redundant user-agent sectionsThe separate user-agent sections for Googlebot, Bingbot, and Slurp are redundant since they only contain
Allow: /, which is already specified forUser-agent: *. These search engines will follow the general rules.Consider simplifying:
-# Allow all major search engines -User-agent: Googlebot -Allow: / - -User-agent: Bingbot -Allow: / - -User-agent: Slurp -Allow: / -src/starlight-overrides/Head.astro (1)
73-78: Use standard schema.org properties instead of customisFeaturedThe
isFeaturedproperty is not part of the schema.org specification and may be ignored by search engines. Consider using standard properties or omitting this non-standard field.Consider using a standard approach:
-if (featured !== undefined) { - structuredData.isPartOf = { - "@type": "CreativeWork", - "isFeatured": featured - }; -} +if (featured) { + // Add to keywords or use a different standard property + structuredData.keywords = structuredData.keywords + ", featured"; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
astro.config.mjs(1 hunks)public/robots.txt(1 hunks)src/content.config.ts(1 hunks)src/pages/docs-suggestions.json.ts(1 hunks)src/starlight-overrides/Head.astro(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
astro.config.mjs (1)
Learnt from: marcosmartini
PR: #253
File: src/content/docs/properties/work-with-properties/property-groups.mdx:13-13
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T06:00:08.396Z
Learning: In the project documentation, the /kinde-apis/management and /kinde-apis/frontend pages use a third-party API reference and client that loads a Single Page Application (SPA). Therefore, links to sections within these pages are valid, even if they appear to point to non-existent sections in static analysis, and should not be flagged.
| }, | ||
| changefreq: 'weekly', | ||
| priority: 0.7, | ||
| lastmod: new Date() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use actual content modification dates instead of build time for lastmod
Using new Date() sets the same modification date (build time) for all pages in the sitemap, which doesn't reflect actual content changes and could mislead search engines about update frequency.
Consider using actual file modification dates or the updated metadata field from your content files for more accurate lastmod values.
Apply this approach to use actual modification dates:
- lastmod: new Date()
+ lastmod: (page) => {
+ // Use the actual modification date from content metadata if available
+ // This would require passing entry data to the sitemap generation
+ return undefined; // Let Astro determine from file system
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In astro.config.mjs at line 334, replace the static assignment of lastmod using
new Date() with dynamic values reflecting actual content modification dates.
Retrieve the last modified timestamp from each content file's metadata or file
system modification time and assign that to lastmod to ensure the sitemap
accurately represents when each page was last updated.
| updated: z.union([z.string(), z.date()]).optional(), // Allow both string and date | ||
| featured: z.boolean().optional(), | ||
| deprecated: z.boolean().optional(), | ||
| 'ai-summary': z.string().optional() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent camelCase naming for all metadata fields
The field 'ai-summary' uses kebab-case while all other metadata fields use camelCase. This inconsistency requires special handling and makes the API less uniform.
- 'ai-summary': z.string().optional()
+ aiSummary: z.string().optional()Note: This change will require updates in other files that reference this field.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'ai-summary': z.string().optional() | |
| aiSummary: z.string().optional() |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/content.config.ts at line 25, rename the metadata field 'ai-summary' to
use camelCase as 'aiSummary' to maintain consistent naming conventions across
all metadata fields. After renaming, update all references to this field in
other files to reflect the new camelCase name to avoid breaking changes.
| }, | ||
| "articleSection": topics.join(", "), | ||
| "articleBody": entry.data.description, | ||
| "wordCount": entry.data.description?.length || 0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix inaccurate wordCount - using character count instead of word count
The wordCount field is set to the character length of the description, not the actual word count. This provides misleading information to search engines.
Either calculate the actual word count or remove this field:
- "wordCount": entry.data.description?.length || 0,
+ "wordCount": entry.data.description?.split(/\s+/).filter(Boolean).length || 0,Or remove it entirely if an accurate count from the full content isn't available:
- "wordCount": entry.data.description?.length || 0,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/starlight-overrides/Head.astro at line 61, the wordCount is incorrectly
calculated using the character length of the description. To fix this, replace
the current assignment with a calculation that counts the actual number of words
in the description string, for example by splitting the string on whitespace and
counting the resulting array length. If an accurate word count cannot be derived
from the description, consider removing the wordCount field entirely to avoid
misleading information.
Description (required)
Updating pages to include a richer header so that SEO and AI LLMs index the content better than before.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores