Add FeatureMetadata to schema feature classes for doc generation

[koxudaxi]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@koxudaxi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dedd3a9 and e1b8734.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• docs/llms-full.txt is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• docs/supported_formats.md
• scripts/build_schema_docs.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/schema_version.py

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-2945.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing feature/schema-feature-metadata (e1b8734) with main (dedd3a9)}

Footnotes

1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (dedd3a9) to head (e1b8734).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #2945   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           94        94           
  Lines        17686     17696   +10     
  Branches      2037      2037           
=========================================
+ Hits         17686     17696   +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.