Skip to content

Conversation

@koxudaxi
Copy link
Owner

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@koxudaxi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88c7fe4 and 85d20ff.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docs/llms-full.txt is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/using_as_module.md
  • src/datamodel_code_generator/__init__.py
  • tests/main/test_main_general.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-2961.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing fix/generate-config-import-error (85d20ff) with main (88c7fe4)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (4cbf3bf) to head (85d20ff).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #2961   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           94        94           
  Lines        17738     17759   +21     
  Branches      2038      2038           
=========================================
+ Hits         17738     17759   +21     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi force-pushed the fix/generate-config-import-error branch from 23d5e26 to 0f79b4d Compare January 12, 2026 15:24
Generated by GitHub Actions
@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit ae89a00 into main Jan 12, 2026
39 checks passed
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix/generate-config-import-error branch January 12, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Breaking Change Analysis

Result: No breaking changes detected

Reasoning: This PR is purely additive - it adds a new convenience import path for GenerateConfig from the top-level module (from datamodel_code_generator import GenerateConfig). The existing import path (from datamodel_code_generator.config import GenerateConfig) continues to work exactly as before. While the new top-level import raises ImportError in Pydantic v1 environments, this is expected behavior for a new feature that requires Pydantic v2, not a change to existing functionality. No existing code will break as a result of this change.


This analysis was performed by Claude Code Action

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 Released in 0.53.0

This PR is now available in the latest release. See the release notes for details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants