-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
fix: add context result with field #619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
zyy98
wants to merge
1
commit into
kptdev:master
Choose a base branch
from
zyy98:withField
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am hoping this function can be smarter: user provides the field
path
andproposedValue
, it can find out thecurrentValue
from thepath
, determining the right type, and validate theproposedValue
fieldAlso. ln304-317 can be simplified by calling
ConfigObjectResult
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is difficult to have a path and determine its
currentValue
, the path might contain a slice. How should I represent the slice usingpath
? Should I add [] in the path?Since I am hard coding the path inside my new transformer, I know in advance if this field is a slice or not. How should I convey this message to
ConfigObjectResultWithField
? For the cases withAdditionalLabelFields
, it uses [] to indicate a slice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggest reading the KRM function specification as I mentioned in last 1:1.
Path is the JSON path of the field e.g.
spec.template.spec.containers[3].resources.limits.cpu
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On second thought, this is suppose to use when logging results. All the results should be updated before the logging. There is no point getting
currentValue
usingpath
@yuwenma . In implementation, the old value and new value are stored in some map, then later used in the logging.