Skip to content

Conversation

ks6088ts
Copy link
Member

@ks6088ts ks6088ts commented Sep 5, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it

  • add responses api model

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #133

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Pull Request Type

What kind of change does this Pull Request introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Documentation content changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

How to Test

  • Get the code
ORGANIZATION=<organization-name>
REPOSITORY=<repository-name>

git clone [email protected]:$ORGANIZATION/$REPOSITORY.git
cd $REPOSITORY
  • Test the code
make ci-test

What to Check

Verify that the following are valid

  • ...

Additional Information

@ks6088ts ks6088ts self-assigned this Sep 5, 2025
@ks6088ts ks6088ts merged commit 93213b3 into main Sep 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@ks6088ts ks6088ts deleted the feature/issue-133_responses-operator branch September 5, 2025 08:51
@ks6088ts ks6088ts restored the feature/issue-133_responses-operator branch September 5, 2025 08:52
@ks6088ts ks6088ts deleted the feature/issue-133_responses-operator branch September 5, 2025 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add responses api operator
1 participant