Skip to content

making transformation work with arrays#17

Merged
kthehatter merged 2 commits intomainfrom
improvements/transformations
Mar 23, 2025
Merged

making transformation work with arrays#17
kthehatter merged 2 commits intomainfrom
improvements/transformations

Conversation

@kthehatter
Copy link
Owner

@kthehatter kthehatter commented Mar 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Transformation functions now support both single values and arrays, offering enhanced flexibility for various inputs.
  • Tests
    • Expanded test coverage with additional cases for arrays and slices across various transformation functions.
    • Updated comparison logic in tests to ensure accurate validation of complex data structures.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new helper function, applyToArrayOrValue, that allows transformation functions to handle both single values and slices. It updates the transformation functions (e.g., ToLower, ToUpper, Trim, etc.) to use any instead of interface{} and delegates their logic to the new helper function using reflection for slice handling. The test cases are revised to support arrays and utilize deep equality checks with reflect.DeepEqual for a more robust validation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
validator/transformers.go Added applyToArrayOrValue for unified handling of single values and slices via reflection; updated transformation functions (ToLower, ToUpper, Trim, RemoveSpecialChars, ToTitleCase, ToInt, ToFloat, Truncate, Replace) to use type any and delegate logic to the helper function.
validator/transformers_test.go Changed test case types from interface{} to any; added new test cases for arrays/slices for each transformation function; replaced simple equality checks with reflect.DeepEqual for complex data comparisons; updated map types in validation tests.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant TF as Transformation Function
    participant HT as applyToArrayOrValue
    participant R as Reflection Check

    C->>TF: Call transformation (e.g., ToLower)
    TF->>HT: Pass input and transformation logic
    HT->>R: Check if input is a slice
    R-->>HT: Return type status
    alt Input is a slice
        HT->>HT: Iterate and apply transformation on each element
    else Input is a single value
        HT->>HT: Apply transformation directly
    end
    HT-->>TF: Return transformed result
    TF-->>C: Send back final result
Loading

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, quick on my feet,
Hoping through code, where logic and checks meet,
From values to arrays, I happily roam,
With helper functions guiding me home,
DeepEqual sings, as my tests all align—
Celebrating changes, oh so divine!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package : could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/gin-gonic/gin""
level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\nbuildir: failed to load package : could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/gin-gonic/gin""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b9c38a and 3162b0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • validator/transformers.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
validator/transformers.go (1)
validator/validator.go (1)
  • Transformer (13-13)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
validator/transformers.go (12)

4-4: Good addition of the reflect package.

Adding the reflect package is necessary for the new array handling functionality.


12-26: Well-implemented helper function for handling both single values and arrays.

The applyToArrayOrValue function effectively abstracts the logic for handling both single values and arrays/slices. It correctly uses reflection to determine the input type and processes each element appropriately.

Note that the function returns []any for slice inputs, which means the original slice type information is lost. This is likely fine for the current use cases but could be something to consider if type-specific operations are needed later.


19-19: Correct implementation of the for loop.

This is the proper way to iterate through indices in a slice using reflection. The previous version had a syntax error (using range v.Len()) that was correctly addressed.


28-36: Good implementation of ToLower with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


38-46: Good implementation of ToUpper with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


48-56: Good implementation of Trim with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


58-72: Good implementation of RemoveSpecialChars with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


74-83: Good implementation of ToTitleCase with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


85-98: Good implementation of ToInt with array support.

The function now handles both single values and arrays properly by delegating to the helper function.


100-113: Good implementation of ToFloat with array support.

The function now handles both single values and arrays properly by delegating to the helper function.


129-139: Good implementation of Replace with array support.

The function now handles both single strings and arrays of strings properly by delegating to the helper function.


115-127:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Verify compatibility with Transformer type.

The Truncate function now returns a function with signature func(value any) any, but the Transformer type in validator.go is defined as func(value interface{}) interface{}. While any is an alias for interface{} in Go 1.18+, make sure your codebase is using a compatible Go version.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Go version used in the project
go version

# Check if there are any type compatibility issues with the Transformer type
# Look for usages of the Transformer type or the functions that return it
rg -A 2 -B 2 "Transformer" --type go

Length of output: 2547


Transformer Type Compatibility Verified

The project is using Go version 1.24.1, which fully supports the any alias for interface{}. The Transformer type is defined as func(value interface{}) interface{}, and the Truncate function returns a function with the signature func(value any) any, which is equivalent. No changes are necessary for compatibility.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
validator/transformers.go (1)

13-13: Consider adding unit tests for the corner cases.

While you've added tests for common scenarios, it would be valuable to add tests for edge cases, such as:

  1. Nested arrays
  2. Arrays with nil elements
  3. Empty arrays
  4. Very large arrays (to test performance)

This would ensure the robustness of the new implementation across all possible scenarios.

Also applies to: 29-29, 39-39, 49-49, 59-59, 75-75, 86-86, 101-101, 117-117, 131-131

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 39f06e0 and 5b9c38a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • validator/transformers.go (1 hunks)
  • validator/transformers_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
validator/transformers_test.go (1)
validator/transformers.go (10)
  • result (62-62)
  • ToLower (29-36)
  • ToUpper (39-46)
  • Trim (49-56)
  • RemoveSpecialChars (59-72)
  • ToTitleCase (75-83)
  • ToInt (86-98)
  • ToFloat (101-113)
  • Truncate (116-127)
  • Replace (130-139)
validator/transformers.go (1)
validator/validator.go (1)
  • Transformer (13-13)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
validator/transformers_test.go (12)

4-4: Great job adding reflect package for deep equality checks.

Incorporating reflect.DeepEqual is the right approach for comparing complex data structures like slices.


10-11: Test cases nicely expanded to handle arrays.

The updated test cases for ToLower now correctly test both single values and collections, covering various scenarios such as arrays of strings, slices of strings, and mixed arrays.

Also applies to: 19-21


26-26: Great switch to reflect.DeepEqual for comparison.

Using reflect.DeepEqual instead of simple equality is necessary for properly comparing slices and arrays.


34-35: Comprehensive test cases for ToUpper transformation.

Test cases now thoroughly validate the function's ability to handle arrays and slices with appropriate expected outputs.

Also applies to: 43-45


58-59: Thoroughly testing Trim with various input types.

The test cases for Trim now properly cover both single values and collections, ensuring the transformation works correctly in all cases.

Also applies to: 67-68


81-82: Complete coverage for RemoveSpecialChars transformation.

Tests now validate both individual strings and collections, ensuring special characters are properly removed in all scenarios.

Also applies to: 88-89


102-103: Good test coverage for ToTitleCase with arrays.

The test cases effectively validate that ToTitleCase works correctly on both individual strings and collections of strings.

Also applies to: 111-112


125-126: Comprehensive tests for ToInt transformation.

Tests now verify the function's ability to handle arrays and slices of convertible values, mixed arrays, and edge cases.

Also applies to: 131-133


146-147: Thorough test coverage for ToFloat transformation.

Test cases effectively validate conversion of various input types including array handling capabilities.

Also applies to: 152-154


168-169: Well-structured tests for Truncate function.

Tests now properly validate the function's ability to handle both single values and collections.

Also applies to: 174-175


189-190: Complete test scenarios for Replace transformation.

Test cases cover all important scenarios including multiple replacements and handling of arrays and slices.

Also applies to: 196-197


239-239: Consistent type updating throughout the codebase.

The migration from interface{} to any has been consistently applied across the codebase, including in the validation test cases.

Also applies to: 244-244, 252-252, 260-260, 268-268, 276-276

validator/transformers.go (10)

4-4: Good addition of the reflect package.

The reflect package is appropriately imported to support the new array handling functionality.


28-36: Clean refactoring of ToLower with array support.

The function now elegantly handles both single values and arrays through the helper function.


38-46: Well-implemented ToUpper transformation.

The function now supports both single values and arrays using a consistent pattern.


48-56: Good implementation of Trim function.

The transformation now correctly handles both individual strings and collections of strings.


58-72: Clean implementation of RemoveSpecialChars.

The function now handles array inputs while maintaining the original character filtering logic.


74-83: Well-structured ToTitleCase implementation.

The transformation correctly applies title casing to both individual strings and collections.


85-98: ToInt properly handles arrays and different types.

The function now correctly transforms both individual values and collections, maintaining type checking.


100-113: Comprehensive ToFloat implementation.

The function correctly handles conversion of different types and now supports arrays.


115-127: Truncate function cleanly adapted for array support.

The transformer now properly handles both individual strings and collections of strings.


129-139: Replace transformer elegantly handles arrays.

The implementation correctly applies string replacement to both individual values and collections.

@kthehatter kthehatter merged commit bda5b93 into main Mar 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@kthehatter kthehatter deleted the improvements/transformations branch March 23, 2025 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant