chore: bump minimum model-registry version to 0.3.6

[jonburdo]

Bump minimum model-registry version under hub extra to 0.3.6.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Checklist:

• Docs included if any changes are user facing

[jonburdo]

/cc @tarilabs

Are we okay with doing this?

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Kubeflow Python SDK’s optional hub extra to require model-registry>=0.3.6, ensuring users who install kubeflow[hub] get a sufficiently recent Model Registry client.

Changes:

• Bump model-registry minimum version for the hub optional dependency to >=0.3.6.
• Regenerate/update uv.lock to reflect model-registry==0.3.6 and associated metadata.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
pyproject.toml	Raises the hub extra’s minimum model-registry version to 0.3.6.
uv.lock	Updates the resolved/pinned model-registry package entry to 0.3.6 and updates lock metadata accordingly.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21926082006

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 67.948%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 21919105330:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	2828
Relevant Lines:	4162

---

💛 - Coveralls

[kramaranya]

Could you also update the README.md please?

[tarilabs]

/lgtm

thanks @jonburdo !

@kramaranya not sure about the README.md as that signifies which Model Registry stream this client is compatible with (i.e. 0.3)

sdk/README.md

Line 189 in 36e2282

| **Kubeflow Model Registry** | ✅ **Available** | v0.3.0+ | Manage model artifacts, versions and ML artifacts metadata |

🤔 or have I looked in the wrong place?

[kramaranya]

@kramaranya not sure about the README.md as that signifies which Model Registry stream this client is compatible with (i.e. 0.3)

sdk/README.md

Line 189 in 36e2282

| **Kubeflow Model Registry** | ✅ **Available** | v0.3.0+ | Manage model artifacts, versions and ML artifacts metadata |

🤔 or have I looked in the wrong place?

Ah yeah, you're right!

Thanks @jonburdo @tarilabs!

/lgtm
/approve
/hold feel free to unhold when ready

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kramaranya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [kramaranya]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment