Skip to content

feat: add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter #1470

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

specialforest
Copy link
Contributor

@specialforest specialforest commented Jul 11, 2024

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
Allows to provision dynamic storage accounts with shared key access disabled.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #1462.

Requirements:

Special notes for your reviewer:
Tested on AKS cluster by mounting dynamic PVC to a pod and writing a file.
Storage class spec:

apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
  name: azureblob-fuse
reclaimPolicy: Delete
volumeBindingMode: Immediate
provisioner: blob.csi.azure.com
allowVolumeExpansion: true
parameters:
  skuName: Premium_LRS
  allowSharedKeyAccess: "false"
  storeAccountKey: "false"
  AzureStorageAuthType: msi
  AzureStorageIdentityClientID: <redacted>

Release note:

none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Jul 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from andyzhangx and cvvz July 11, 2024 05:31
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @specialforest!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/blob-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/blob-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @specialforest. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 11, 2024
@specialforest
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need to add a unit test.

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

allowSharedKeyAccess parameter needs to be added in azure cloud provider first

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

allowSharedKeyAccess parameter needs to be added in azure cloud provider first

nvm, allowSharedKeyAccess is already added in azure cloud provider

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 11, 2024
@specialforest specialforest marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2024 20:17
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 11, 2024
@@ -310,6 +316,10 @@ func (d *Driver) CreateVolume(ctx context.Context, req *csi.CreateVolumeRequest)
storageEndpointSuffix = d.getStorageEndPointSuffix()
}

if storeAccountKey && !pointer.BoolDeref(allowSharedKeyAccess, false) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think here should be !pointer.BoolDeref(allowSharedKeyAccess, true) since if we didn't give allowSharedKeyAccess the default is true

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, the default value is true

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically allowSharedKeyAccess is never nil here but let me refactor the code a little to make it more straightforward.

Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 13, 2024
@andyzhangx andyzhangx changed the title Add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter feat: add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter Jul 13, 2024
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

3 similar comments
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 14, 2024
@andyzhangx andyzhangx force-pushed the allowSharedKeyAccess branch from 4976b1b to cced80d Compare July 14, 2024 05:21
Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, specialforest

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c31e6ab into kubernetes-sigs:master Jul 14, 2024
22 checks passed
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/cherrypick release-1.24

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/cherrypick release-1.23

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@andyzhangx: new pull request created: #1481

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-1.24

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@andyzhangx: #1470 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.23":

Applying: feat: add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter
Applying: Add basic test
Applying: PR feedback
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/blob/controllerserver.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/blob/controllerserver.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/blob/controllerserver.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0003 PR feedback
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-1.23

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamically provisioned storage account with shared key access disabled
5 participants