-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
feat: add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter #1470
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add allowSharedKeyAccess parameter #1470
Conversation
Welcome @specialforest! |
Hi @specialforest. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Need to add a unit test. |
|
nvm, |
pkg/blob/controllerserver.go
Outdated
@@ -310,6 +316,10 @@ func (d *Driver) CreateVolume(ctx context.Context, req *csi.CreateVolumeRequest) | |||
storageEndpointSuffix = d.getStorageEndPointSuffix() | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if storeAccountKey && !pointer.BoolDeref(allowSharedKeyAccess, false) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think here should be !pointer.BoolDeref(allowSharedKeyAccess, true)
since if we didn't give allowSharedKeyAccess the default is true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, the default value is true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically allowSharedKeyAccess is never nil here but let me refactor the code a little to make it more straightforward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
4976b1b
to
cced80d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, specialforest The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherrypick release-1.24 |
/cherrypick release-1.23 |
@andyzhangx: new pull request created: #1481 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@andyzhangx: #1470 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.23":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Allows to provision dynamic storage accounts with shared key access disabled.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1462.
Requirements:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Tested on AKS cluster by mounting dynamic PVC to a pod and writing a file.
Storage class spec:
Release note: