Revert "use az to download storage blobs for custom builds"

[jackfrancis]

Reverts #4724

Confirmed that this change doesn't work w/ the existing CI config. We'll have to introduce this change w/ this:

#4765

[jackfrancis]

/label release-note-none

[k8s-ci-robot]

@jackfrancis: The label(s) /label release-note-none cannot be applied. These labels are supported: api-review, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, team/katacoda, refactor. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label release-note-none

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jackfrancis]

/release-note-none

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.77%. Comparing base (6e2dbff) to head (35dfb57).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4812   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.77%   62.77%           
=======================================
  Files         199      199           
  Lines       16569    16569           
=======================================
  Hits        10402    10402           
  Misses       5389     5389           
  Partials      778      778           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mboersma]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: e846eb5cce667060d3c1db69aa41fe18306ae32a

[nojnhuh]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [nojnhuh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[nojnhuh]

@jackfrancis Do we need to cherry-pick this?

[jackfrancis]

@nojnhuh need to get this back into 1.13 and 1.14 branches, yes

doing some more local testing to validate the reversions works as expected, stay tuned...

[jackfrancis]

/cherry-pick release-1.13
/cherry-pick release-1.14

[k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot]

@jackfrancis: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.13 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.13
/cherry-pick release-1.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot]

@jackfrancis: new pull request created: #4813

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.13
/cherry-pick release-1.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot]

@jackfrancis: new pull request created: #4814

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.13
/cherry-pick release-1.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.