Bump CAAPH to v0.2.5

[mboersma]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Updates CAAPH in tests to the current release v0.2.5.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

• cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

[mboersma]

/assign @Jont828

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.17%. Comparing base (cc3e8e9) to head (9051bd6).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4869   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.17%   51.17%           
=======================================
  Files         273      273           
  Lines       24616    24616           
=======================================
  Hits        12597    12597           
  Misses      11234    11234           
  Partials      785      785           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mboersma]

/retitle Bump CAAPH to v0.2.3

[mboersma]

@Jont828 any idea what I'm doing wrong here?

 [FAILED] in [SynchronizedBeforeSuite] - /home/prow/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/test@v1.7.2/framework/clusterctl/client.go:90 @ 05/30/24 15:23:15.423
  << Timeline
  [FAILED] failed to run clusterctl init
  Unexpected error:
      <*errors.withStack | 0xc005509d58>: 
      failed to get provider components for the "helm" provider: failed to get repository client for the AddonProvider with name helm: error creating the local filesystem repository client: failed to get latest version: failed to find releases tagged with a valid semantic version number
      {
          error: <*errors.withMessage | 0xc0034798a0>{
              cause: <*errors.withStack | 0xc005509d28>{
                  error: <*errors.withMessage | 0xc003479880>{
                      cause: <*errors.withStack | 0xc005509cf8>{
                          error: <*errors.withMessage | 0xc003479860>{
                              cause: <*errors.withStack | 0xc005509cc8>{
                                  error: <*errors.withMessage | 0xc003479840>{
                                      cause: <*errors.fundamental | 0xc005509c98>{
                                          msg: "failed to find releases tagged with a valid semantic version number",
                                          stack: [..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ...],
                                      },
                                      msg: "failed to get latest version",
                                  },
                                  stack: [0x33b1e10, 0x33a6fca, 0x33a6bdd, 0x33a69dc, 0x378b430, 0x378c5ba, 0x3791a25, 0x37915a5, 0x37907e5, 0x38c4de8, 0x38ca568, 0x42049db, 0x4203052, 0x1a047c7, 0x1a03899, 0x2f4b3fc, 0x2f5be0e, 0x2f5f70d, 0x198b6c1],
                              },
                              msg: "error creating the local filesystem repository client",
                          },
                          stack: [0x33a6fe6, 0x33a6bdd, 0x33a69dc, 0x378b430, 0x378c5ba, 0x3791a25, 0x37915a5, 0x37907e5, 0x38c4de8, 0x38ca568, 0x42049db, 0x4203052, 0x1a047c7, 0x1a03899, 0x2f4b3fc, 0x2f5be0e, 0x2f5f70d, 0x198b6c1],
                      },
                      msg: "failed to get repository client for the AddonProvider with name helm",
                  },
                  stack: [0x33a6cdd, 0x33a69dc, 0x378b430, 0x378c5ba, 0x3791a25, 0x37915a5, 0x37907e5, 0x38c4de8, 0x38ca568, 0x42049db, 0x4203052, 0x1a047c7, 0x1a03899, 0x2f4b3fc, 0x2f5be0e, 0x2f5f70d, 0x198b6c1],
              },
              msg: "failed to get provider components for the \"helm\" provider",
          },
          stack: [0x3791e3a, 0x37915a5, 0x37907e5, 0x38c4de8, 0x38ca568, 0x42049db, 0x4203052, 0x1a047c7, 0x1a03899, 0x2f4b3fc, 0x2f5be0e, 0x2f5f70d, 0x198b6c1],
      }
  occurred
  In [SynchronizedBeforeSuite] at: /home/prow/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/test@v1.7.2/framework/clusterctl/client.go:90 @ 05/30/24 15:23:15.423
  Full Stack Trace

[mboersma]

/retitle Bump CAAPH to v0.2.4

[mboersma]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mboersma]

/close

I'm still not sure what's wrong here, and there seems to be little interest, so I'll close it.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mboersma: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

I'm still not sure what's wrong here, and there seems to be little interest, so I'll close it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mboersma]

/reopen

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mboersma: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mboersma]

/retitle Bump CAAPH to v0.2.5

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mboersma: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-with-wi-optional	e0a1d26	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-with-wi-optional

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[Jont828]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 4d22f8526df7a75213ed22620d3ae9a3c03ccc0b

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jont828

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Jont828]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment