Skip to content

WIP: Upgrade calico to 3.29 #5688

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

WIP: Upgrade calico to 3.29 #5688

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
This is based off of #5523 and aims to fix rate limited issues

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #5498

Special notes for your reviewer:

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • cherry-pick candidate

Release note:

Update Calico to 3.29

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 9, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fabriziopandini for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 9, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 52.84%. Comparing base (9835698) to head (6448ad6).
⚠️ Report is 197 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5688   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.84%   52.84%           
=======================================
  Files         278      278           
  Lines       29610    29610           
=======================================
  Hits        15647    15647           
  Misses      13146    13146           
  Partials      817      817

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 11, 2025
@willie-yao willie-yao changed the title [WIP] Upgrade calico to 3.29 Upgrade calico to 3.29 Jun 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 11, 2025
@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold to test for more confidence quay doesn't rate limit us

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 13, 2025
@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts-dra
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-custom-builds
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 17, 2025
@mboersma mboersma added this to the v1.21 milestone Jun 18, 2025
@mboersma mboersma moved this from Todo to In Progress in CAPZ Planning Jun 18, 2025
@jsturtevant @willie-yao
Upgrade to calico 3.29 and use windows support (kubernetes-sigs#5523)
57d00c9 
* Upgrade to calico 3.29 and use windows support

Signed-off-by: James Sturtevant <[email protected]>

* Don't use images from MCR

Signed-off-by: James Sturtevant <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: James Sturtevant <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 18, 2025
@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts-dra
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-custom-builds
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts-dra
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-custom-builds
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade

@willie-yao willie-yao changed the title Upgrade calico to 3.29 WIP: Upgrade calico to 3.29 Jun 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 9, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jackfrancis jackfrancis modified the milestones: v1.21, next Aug 12, 2025
This was referenced Aug 21, 2025
Merged
Merged
@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/close
Superseded by #5844

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@willie-yao: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
Superseded by #5844

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in CAPZ Planning Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jsturtevant jsturtevant Awaiting requested review from jsturtevant

@mboersma mboersma Awaiting requested review from mboersma

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

CAPZ Planning
Status: Done

Milestone

next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update the Calico version for testing

5 participants

@willie-yao @k8s-ci-robot @mboersma @jackfrancis @jsturtevant