Skip to content

Conversation

@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor

@Amulyam24 Amulyam24 commented Aug 11, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:
Update cluster-api version to v1.11.0-rc.0

Errors on cluster deployment:

Error from server (BadRequest): error when creating "vpc.yaml": KubeadmControlPlane in version "v1beta2" cannot be handled as a KubeadmControlPlane: strict decoding error: unknown field "spec.machineTemplate.infrastructureRef"

----

Error from server (Invalid): error when creating "first.yaml": KubeadmControlPlane.controlplane.cluster.x-k8s.io "ibm-powervs-1-control-plane" is invalid: spec.kubeadmConfigSpec.joinConfiguration.discovery.bootstrapToken.caCertHashes: Invalid value: 0: spec.kubeadmConfigSpec.joinConfiguration.discovery.bootstrapToken.caCertHashes in body should have at least 1 items
Error from server (Invalid): error when creating "first.yaml": KubeadmConfigTemplate.bootstrap.cluster.x-k8s.io "ibm-powervs-1-md-0" is invalid: spec.template.spec.joinConfiguration.discovery.bootstrapToken.caCertHashes: Invalid value: 0: spec.template.spec.joinConfiguration.discovery.bootstrapToken.caCertHashes in body should have at least 1 items

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

/area provider/ibmcloud

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

Release note:

Update cluster-api version to v1.11.0-rc.0

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider label Aug 11, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eeeb49a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud/deploys/689b18e628207b000768392c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2456.cluster-api-ibmcloud.sigs.k8s.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 11, 2025
@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @Karthik-K-N

@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor Author

VPC cluster deployment tested successfully.

/hold for PowerVS testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2025
@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

Testing completed for both VPC and PowerVS.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2025
@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor Author

Amulyam24 commented Aug 11, 2025

VPC

 % kubectl get clusters
NAME           CLUSTERCLASS   AVAILABLE   CP DESIRED   CP AVAILABLE   CP UP-TO-DATE   W DESIRED   W AVAILABLE   W UP-TO-DATE   PHASE         AGE   VERSION
amulya-vpc-0                  True        1            1              1               1           1             1              Provisioned   17m

% kubectl get machines
NAME                               CLUSTER        NODE NAME                          READY   AVAILABLE   UP-TO-DATE   PHASE     AGE   VERSION
amulya-vpc-0-control-plane-hhhdg   amulya-vpc-0   amulya-vpc-0-control-plane-hhhdg   True    True        True         Running   10m   v1.33.0
amulya-vpc-0-md-0-t5qm2-cjzl2      amulya-vpc-0   amulya-vpc-0-md-0-t5qm2-cjzl2      True    True        True         Running   10m   v1.33.0

PowerVS:

% kubectl get clusters
NAME            CLUSTERCLASS   AVAILABLE   CP DESIRED   CP AVAILABLE   CP UP-TO-DATE   W DESIRED   W AVAILABLE   W UP-TO-DATE   PHASE         AGE   VERSION
ibm-powervs-1                  True        1            1              1               1           1             1              Provisioned   12m
 % kubectl get machines
NAME                                CLUSTER         NODE NAME                           READY   AVAILABLE   UP-TO-DATE   PHASE     AGE   VERSION
ibm-powervs-1-control-plane-l45rb   ibm-powervs-1   ibm-powervs-1-control-plane-l45rb   True    True        True         Running   12m   v1.32.3
ibm-powervs-1-md-0-b9bvx-kvgbd      ibm-powervs-1   ibm-powervs-1-md-0-b9bvx-kvgbd      True    True        True         Running   12m   v1.32.3

Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, One validation comment, Otherwiese looks good.

@Prajyot-Parab
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Prajyot-Parab Prajyot-Parab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, Dont we have a issue template with checklists of items while updating the CAPI version?

/lgtm

@Amulyam24
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you, Dont we have a issue template with checklists of items while updating the CAPI version?

We have it - https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/cluster_api_version_update.md

As this is a minor version update, we have fewer items to update. Most of the changes are due to v1beta2.

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you, Dont we have a issue template with checklists of items while updating the CAPI version?

We have it - https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/cluster_api_version_update.md

As this is a minor version update, we have fewer items to update. Most of the changes are due to v1beta2.

cool, Thanks

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Amulyam24, Prajyot-Parab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 264ac1e into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 12, 2025
14 checks passed
arshadd-b pushed a commit to arshadd-b/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants