Skip to content

Conversation

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jan 8, 2026

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Follow-up to: #13177 (comment)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jan 8, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 8, 2026
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/area documentation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/documentation Issues or PRs related to documentation and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Jan 8, 2026
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini
/assign @mboersma

Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thank you!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 8, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: bc54ae6e4d6c26917311861aa6feb478d9f1a756

* extending the support matrix for the latest supported Cluster API minor release to:
* Five Kubernetes minor releases for the management cluster (N - N-4)
* Seven Kubernetes minor releases for the workload cluster (N - N-6)
* extending the support matrix for the Cluster API minor release before that to:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about adding a note explaining that we are doing this only starting from K8s 1.36

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, done

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wanted to know, why now? was there any ask or something?

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-extendd-kk-support-policy branch from 74cd422 to da996c5 Compare January 9, 2026 13:40
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2026
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 82a2b1b942799adf1c9437e276548897457bc475

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 9, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a64cfe0 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 9, 2026
16 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.13 milestone Jan 9, 2026
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-extendd-kk-support-policy branch January 9, 2026 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/documentation Issues or PRs related to documentation cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants