-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
One liner: add COPY api ./api command to resolve import dependency in… #1585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One liner: add COPY api ./api command to resolve import dependency in… #1585
Conversation
… /pkg/epp/datalayer/factory.go:28:2: no required module provides package sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api-inference-extension/api/v1
✅ Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA. |
Welcome @davidbreitgand! |
Hi @davidbreitgand. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@davidbreitgand need to sign commits and have CLA enabled |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: davidbreitgand, nirrozenbaum The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
… /pkg/epp/datalayer/factory.go:28:2: no required module provides package sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api-inference-extension/api/v1
Issue
/kind bugWhat this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1584
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Related to the developer persona