Skip to content

Conversation

jyizheng
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

There is an open issue for it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

#1569

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Sep 17, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ace6756
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/68cb2121fc4e470008efd94d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1610--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jyizheng. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 17, 2025
pullPolicy: Always
extProcPort: 9002
env: []
# Environment variables for the EPP container.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest adding the flag back so that helm can work with older versions of EPP, or a different distro of EPP such as inference scheduler, which may not have implemented the NAMESPACE env var fallback. Sent a PR #1633

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this PR is fully optional, but I have heard multiple people (me included) using latest helm and got EPP crashlooping due to missing this. And it's not super obvious (the error will be some SA permission error due to the mismatched namespace). I think this is a nice to have even if we have the NAMESPACE var.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sg

@jyizheng jyizheng force-pushed the add-namespace-env-to-helm branch from a8a66f2 to 14a884e Compare September 17, 2025 20:54
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Sep 17, 2025

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 17, 2025
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Sep 18, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, jyizheng

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 951d8b9 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 18, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants