-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
API for Off-Cluster Gateways (superseeds #3894) #3941
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Flynn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Flynn <[email protected]>
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: karthikbox The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @karthikbox! |
Hi @karthikbox. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This commit addresses several logical inconsistencies and ambiguities in GEP-3792 (Out-of-Cluster Gateways) to provide a clearer path for implementers. Key changes: - Resolves the contradiction in the "Protocol Problem" by definitively stating that the initial release will use standard "bare" mTLS, deferring a custom ALPN to a future GEP. - Clarifies the "Trust Problem" solution by establishing Secret references as the baseline for conformance, while recommending ClusterTrustBundle as the preferred, forward-looking approach.
1d0fab7
to
a0db3f2
Compare
Does it need review or this is the same as #3952 ? |
/kind gep
Hello everyone,
The original PR for this GEP (#3894) is unlikely to make the v1.4 release, as the author (@kflynn) has limited availability to continue the work.
After speaking with Flynn and getting their approval, I am taking ownership of this GEP. To meet the v1.4 release timeline, I've reduced the scope of the original proposal and added more info to some sections.
This pull request supersedes #3894.