generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
Add Conformance tests for BackendTLSPolicy validating SANs with Type dsnName #3983
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kl52752
wants to merge
2
commits into
kubernetes-sigs:main
Choose a base branch
from
kl52752:san-tests
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+191
−3
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -70,6 +70,24 @@ spec: | |
- path: | ||
type: Exact | ||
value: /backendTLSCertMismatch | ||
- backendRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: Service | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-san-mismatch-test | ||
port: 443 | ||
matches: | ||
- path: | ||
type: Exact | ||
value: /backendTLSSanMismatch | ||
- backendRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: Service | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-san-test | ||
port: 443 | ||
matches: | ||
- path: | ||
type: Exact | ||
value: /backendTLSSan | ||
--- | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: Service | ||
|
@@ -115,6 +133,36 @@ spec: | |
port: 443 | ||
targetPort: 8443 | ||
--- | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: Service | ||
metadata: | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-san-mismatch-test | ||
namespace: gateway-conformance-infra | ||
spec: | ||
selector: | ||
app: backendtlspolicy-test | ||
ports: | ||
- name: "btls" | ||
protocol: TCP | ||
appProtocol: HTTPS | ||
port: 443 | ||
targetPort: 8443 | ||
--- | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: Service | ||
metadata: | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-san-test | ||
namespace: gateway-conformance-infra | ||
spec: | ||
selector: | ||
app: backendtlspolicy-test | ||
ports: | ||
- name: "btls" | ||
protocol: TCP | ||
appProtocol: HTTPS | ||
port: 443 | ||
targetPort: 8443 | ||
--- | ||
# Deployment must not be applied until after the secret is generated. | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
|
@@ -222,18 +270,43 @@ spec: | |
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha3 | ||
kind: BackendTLSPolicy | ||
metadata: | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-cert-mismatch | ||
kl52752 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
name: backendtlspolicy-san | ||
namespace: gateway-conformance-infra | ||
spec: | ||
targetRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: Service | ||
name: "backendtlspolicy-cert-mismatch-test" | ||
name: "backendtlspolicy-san-test" | ||
sectionName: "btls" | ||
validation: | ||
caCertificateRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: ConfigMap | ||
# This secret is generated dynamically by the test suite. | ||
name: "backend-tls-mismatch-certificate" | ||
hostname: "abc.example.com" | ||
name: "backend-tls-certificate" | ||
subjectAltNames: | ||
- type: Hostname | ||
hostname: abc.example.com | ||
hostname: "mismatch.example.com" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This seems like it's testing a config mismatch instead of a mismatch in the cert itself. Can we also include a test that covers a case where the config lines up but the cert served by the backend does not match either the configured hostname or the SANs? |
||
--- | ||
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha3 | ||
kind: BackendTLSPolicy | ||
metadata: | ||
name: backendtlspolicy-san-mismatch | ||
namespace: gateway-conformance-infra | ||
spec: | ||
targetRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: Service | ||
name: "backendtlspolicy-san-mismatch-test" | ||
sectionName: "btls" | ||
validation: | ||
caCertificateRefs: | ||
- group: "" | ||
kind: ConfigMap | ||
# This secret is generated dynamically by the test suite. | ||
name: "backend-tls-certificate" | ||
kl52752 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
subjectAltNames: | ||
- type: Hostname | ||
hostname: cde.example.com | ||
hostname: "mismatch.example.com" |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like this will pass if any non-200 error code is returned. Can we be more specific here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually the spec is a bit vague here, error codes are not constrained but it is up to implementation how to signal the error