Refactor kustomize manifests to keep the same structure as Helm chart

[ChenYi015]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

• Reorganize the Kustomize manifests to keep the same structure as Helm chart.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

It will make PR #824 easier to review after this refactoring.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-jobset canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9468f90
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-jobset/deploys/6901b720a9d76000085c5fd5

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ChenYi015
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign danielvegamyhre for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @ChenYi015. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[GiuseppeTT]

/ok-to-test

[GiuseppeTT]

Running make generate shows a missing file config/components/webhook/manifests.yaml.

[GiuseppeTT]

Can you provide more details? Like, if you are only moving yaml content around, be explicit about where content "X" was and where it will be and how it makes kustomize consistent with the helm template structure. If you are also adding or removing yaml content, be explicit about it.

Also, how is this PR going to help with #824? Is it a subset of #824?

[GiuseppeTT]

Why are you removing it? What happens if we modify the rbacs in ./api/... and ./pkg/...?

[GiuseppeTT]

I thought more about this. IMO a better approach is just getting rid of kustomize and use only the helm chart. We can do that if we use the helm chart to generate the release manifest. See #820 (comment)

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.