Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.23.0 to 2.23.3

[dependabot]

Bumps github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.23.0 to 2.23.3.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's releases.

v2.23.3

2.23.3

Fixes

• allow - as a standalone argument [cfcc1a5]
• Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context() [feaf292]
• ignore exit code for symbol test on linux [88e2282]

v2.23.2

2.23.2

🎉🎉🎉

At long last, some long-standing performance gaps between ginkgo and go test have been resolved!

Ginkgo operates by running go test -c to generate test binaries, and then running those binaries. It turns out that the compilation step of go test -c is slower than go test's compilation step because go test strips out debug symbols (ldflags=-w) whereas go test -c does not.

Ginkgo now passes the appropriate ldflags to go test -c when running specs to strip out symbols. This is only done when it is safe to do so and symbols are preferred when profiling is enabled and when ginkgo build is called explicitly.

This, coupled, with the instructions for disabling XProtect on MacOS yields a much better performance experience with Ginkgo.

v2.23.1

2.23.1

🚨 For users on MacOS 🚨

A long-standing Ginkgo performance issue on MacOS seems to be due to mac's antimalware XProtect. You can follow the instructions here to disable it in your terminal. Doing so sped up Ginkgo's own test suite from 1m8s to 47s.

Fixes

Ginkgo's CLI is now a bit clearer if you pass flags in incorrectly:

• make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags, not an absolute directory [a0e52ff]
• emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after positional arguments [b799d8d]

This might cause existing CI builds to fail. If so then it's likely that your CI build was misconfigured and should be corrected. Open an issue if you need help.

Changelog

Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's changelog.

2.23.3

Fixes

• allow - as a standalone argument [cfcc1a5]
• Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context() [feaf292]
• ignore exit code for symbol test on linux [88e2282]

2.23.2

🎉🎉🎉

At long last, some long-standing performance gaps between ginkgo and go test have been resolved!

Ginkgo operates by running go test -c to generate test binaries, and then running those binaries. It turns out that the compilation step of go test -c is slower than go test's compilation step because go test strips out debug symbols (ldflags=-w) whereas go test -c does not.

Ginkgo now passes the appropriate ldflags to go test -c when running specs to strip out symbols. This is only done when it is safe to do so and symbols are preferred when profiling is enabled and when ginkgo build is called explicitly.

This, coupled, with the instructions for disabling XProtect on MacOS yields a much better performance experience with Ginkgo.

2.23.1

🚨 For users on MacOS 🚨

A long-standing Ginkgo performance issue on MacOS seems to be due to mac's antimalware XProtect. You can follow the instructions here to disable it in your terminal. Doing so sped up Ginkgo's own test suite from 1m8s to 47s.

Fixes

Ginkgo's CLI is now a bit clearer if you pass flags in incorrectly:

• make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags, not an absolute directory [a0e52ff]
• emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after positional arguments [b799d8d]

This might cause existing CI builds to fail. If so then it's likely that your CI build was misconfigured and should be corrected. Open an issue if you need help.

Commits

• 04a9a74 v2.23.3
• cfcc1a5 allow - as a standalone argument
• feaf292 Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context()
• 88e2282 ignore exit code for symbol test on linux
• 979c969 v2.23.2
• 976a5c0 strip out symbols when running ginkgo
• 99e2fe2 v2.23.1
• a0e52ff make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags...
• b799d8d emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after position...
• a565d1f Fix typo in documentation: DescribeHandleSubtree -> DescribeTableSubtree
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kmm ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	fe91c91
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kmm/deploys/67e2265fbea2ff0008804a84
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1058--kubernetes-sigs-kmm.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[ybettan]

/ok-to-test
/approve
/assign @yevgeny-shnaidman

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dependabot[bot], ybettan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ybettan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[yevgeny-shnaidman]

/lgtm