-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
🌱 ci: add e2e tests for multigroup testdata layout and rename sample #4154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 ci: add e2e tests for multigroup testdata layout and rename sample #4154
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
f49e667 to
cae6c7a
Compare
cae6c7a to
34792a4
Compare
34792a4 to
835844d
Compare
835844d to
594ce4f
Compare
93c3e75 to
c236f20
Compare
c236f20 to
7af1845
Compare
We need to rename the name of the sample because of: ```shell The Service "project-v4-multigroup-with-plugins-controller-manager-metrics-service" is invalid: metadata.name: Invalid value: "project-v4-multigroup-with-plugins-controller-manager-metrics-service": must be no more than 63 characters ``` Therefore, in this we are: - Creating jobs to run the e2e tests for all testdata samples in parallel - Renaming the sample project-v4-multigroup-with-plugins to project-v4-multigroup to generate manifests names that can be accepted in k8s
7af1845 to
3352876
Compare
|
This one only add the tests so that we can ensure the default layout and avoid issues like #4161 So, it only need to pass in the e2e tests to be checked, if anyone has a hall for improvements here please feel free to raise a follow up PR but I will not make nobody waste time on reviews of this one and I am moving forward. Either it will support follow up initiatives for we ensure that all is fine. |
We need to rename the name of the sample because of:
Therefore, in this we are:
PS.: See that it help us for example, found the issue: #4162