Skip to content

Conversation

loucadufault
Copy link
Contributor

@loucadufault loucadufault commented Oct 2, 2025

Description

Link to spark example points to a location which seems to have been moved to _archived/ folder in that repo, in this commit: kubernetes/examples@8b3fa9a

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 2, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Oct 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from mimowo and soltysh October 2, 2025 14:11
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @loucadufault!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/website 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/website has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 2, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 2, 2025

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 62933b2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/68f12ec7a315550008743fbc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-52607--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

@loucadufault Thanks you for your contribution.
Could you please sign the CLA before the PR can be reviewed.
You can follow the steps documented here: https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md

Copy link
Member

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/easycla

(To re-trigger the EasyCLA bot)

Copy link
Member

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/easycla


One example of this pattern would be a Job which starts a Pod which runs a script that in turn
starts a Spark master controller (see [spark example](https://github.com/kubernetes/examples/tree/master/staging/spark/README.md)),
starts a Spark master controller (see [spark example](https://github.com/kubernetes/examples/tree/master/_archived/spark/README.md)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As in previous examples, I'd prefer we drop these links, rather than updating them. Everything that moved to _archived directory is not maintained and usually outdated. So the recommendation from sig-apps is to drop them.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment still holds.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@soltysh just to confirm, would you say that we should take out the spark example text and link listed altogether? (meaning, just having the text "starts a Spark master controller") – or should that text also be omitted?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to dropping these. The examples are archived because they are no longer maintained. Keeping links to them from current documentation results in issues and PRs from folks trying to bring them up to date, which is counter to the idea of them being archived.

I would say if someone wants to add a new, updated example that can be linked to, then that would be awesome. But unless/until we have that, I agree it should just be dropped from the docs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@natalisucks
Copy link
Contributor

@loucadufault hello! thanks for your first contribution. however, we cannot move forward with this change without the CLA being signed. please find instructions on how to do so here: https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md

@loucadufault
Copy link
Contributor Author

/easycla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 10, 2025
@loucadufault loucadufault requested a review from soltysh October 16, 2025 17:44
@loucadufault loucadufault changed the title Update job.md to fix dead link to spark example Drop spark example with archived link Oct 16, 2025
@natalisucks
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh @stmcginnis If you're good with the latest update that drops this example, then so is docs – thanks for taking another look

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

Given it is old and archived, I think this makes sense. Ideally we would have a newer example we can point to, but that's kind of an ongoing need anyway.

Thanks for cleaning this up!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 243835c50ae14f0b92b26824b5c1e4490d381e60

@natalisucks
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @stmcginnis! and thank you @loucadufault for your contribution and for being open to feedback from maintainers 👏
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: natalisucks

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5ed5741 into kubernetes:main Oct 16, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants