Skip to content

add missing container process to MemoryQoS note on Resource Management page#55294

Open
sethmccombs wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:mainfrom
sethmccombs:docs/fix-requests-and-limits-typo
Open

add missing container process to MemoryQoS note on Resource Management page#55294
sethmccombs wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:mainfrom
sethmccombs:docs/fix-requests-and-limits-typo

Conversation

@sethmccombs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

There is a Note: under the Requests and Limits heading on the "Resource Management" page, that is missing the words "container process" and therefore doesn't read properly

due to a potential livelock situation a memory hungry can cause.

vs

due to a potential livelock situation a memory hungry container process can cause.

I opted for "container process" over "container" based on the linked KEP's Latest Update but can switch to "container", whatever folks think is best!

Issue

No open issue

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language labels Apr 8, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lmktfy for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 8, 2026
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4789e21
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/69d6811711a873000929b576
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-55294--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@CodesbyUnnati
Copy link
Copy Markdown

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@Caesarsage
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

make the docs clearer

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 0f920f16259916a1ff18855e1bef46ebfe560d70

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants