Refactor and consolidate module test files into a single directory#2997
Refactor and consolidate module test files into a single directory#2997redscholar merged 1 commit intokubesphere:mainfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: redscholar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
f7d979a to
419ee33
Compare
Summary of ChangesHello @redscholar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the internal structure of the module system, focusing on improving code organization, maintainability, and testability. By moving each module into its own subdirectory and introducing a shared 'internal' package for common logic and testing utilities, the codebase becomes more modular and easier to navigate. This restructuring streamlines the development process, making it simpler to manage and extend individual modules and their associated tests, ultimately enhancing the overall quality and scalability of the project. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the module system by moving common functionalities and constants into a new pkg/modules/internal package. Each module (add_hostvars, assert, command, copy, debug, fetch, gen_cert, http_get_file, image, include_vars, prometheus, result, set_fact, setup, template) has been updated to use this internal package for ExecOptions, standard output/error constants, and module registration. This involves changing package names to match their directory, removing redundant utilruntime imports, updating function signatures to use internal.ExecOptions, and replacing direct constant references with those from the internal package. Additionally, all old test files have been replaced with new, more comprehensive unit tests for each module, and the module.go file now centrally registers all modules using the new internal.RegisterModule function. Review comments highlight an inconsistency in the gen_cert package name, suggesting it be renamed to gen_cert for Go convention, and recommend refactoring repeated LogOutput handling in the debug module for better code clarity and consistency.
f98f1e0 to
a810ebc
Compare
…ructure - Deleted multiple individual test files for various modules (e.g., add_hostvars_test.go, assert_test.go, command_test.go, etc.) to streamline the testing framework. - Introduced a new consolidated test file for the add_hostvars module, which includes comprehensive test cases for argument parsing and execution scenarios. - This restructuring enhances maintainability and organization of the test suite, making it easier to manage and extend in the future. Signed-off-by: redscholar <blacktiledhouse@gmail.com>
a810ebc to
5a1a170
Compare
|


What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for reviewers:
Does this PR introduced a user-facing change?
Additional documentation, usage docs, etc.: