NO-JIRA | fix: fix failing unit tests

[amalimov]

unit tests were not aligned with the new complexity scores

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated OS complexity scoring expectations for CentOS 7 (64-bit) and FreeBSD (64-bit) in test suites; OS classification refinement applied.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 00b8dd58-d3f3-4e9f-94a9-88be7634dd3f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1f1b26 and caf42bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• internal/handlers/v1alpha1/estimation_test.go
• internal/service/estimation_test.go
• pkg/estimations/complexity/complexity_test.go

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates test expectations for OS complexity scoring across three test files. CentOS 7 (64-bit) complexity score changes from 2 to 1, FreeBSD (64-bit) changes from 0 to 3, and one OS name is updated from VMware Photon OS to Other Linux in tests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
OS Complexity Scoring Tests internal/handlers/v1alpha1/estimation_test.go, internal/service/estimation_test.go, pkg/estimations/complexity/complexity_test.go	Updated complexity score expectations for CentOS 7 (64-bit) from 2→1 and FreeBSD (64-bit) from 0→3. Renamed VMware Photon OS (64-bit) to Other Linux (64-bit) in test assertions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• ECOPROJECT-4173 | feat: Align "Complexity by OS" heuristics to those … #981 — Directly related: modifies the same OS complexity scoring adjustments (CentOS 7 2→1, FreeBSD 0→3) with coordinated test updates.

Suggested labels

lgtm, approved

Suggested reviewers

• machacekondra
• Jos-Jerus

Poem

🐰 Complexity scores now ring true,
CentOS lighter, FreeBSD bold and new,
Tests dance with precision's delight,
OS classifiers shining bright! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: fixing failing unit tests by updating test expectations to align with new complexity scores.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ronenav]

/lgtm

[Jos-Jerus]

/approve

[ronenav]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jos-Jerus, ronenav

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Jos-Jerus,ronenav]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment