Fix TaskQueue worker thread 100% CPU spin when idle#1899
Fix TaskQueue worker thread 100% CPU spin when idle#1899Halcyonhal9 wants to merge 2 commits intokvcache-ai:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the efficiency of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the TaskQueue to use std::mutex and std::condition_variable for synchronization, replacing a spin-lock in the sync method and introducing a waiting mechanism in the worker thread. The review identifies a potential deadlock in the sync method if the done flag is not checked in the wait predicate. It also points out that the empty lock scope in enqueue introduces a performance bottleneck and suggests using cv.wait_for in the worker function to avoid locking in enqueue and prevent lost notifications.
…ck during destruction Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
Fixes #1858 and #1898. The
TaskQueue::worker()thread busy-spins at 100% CPU when no tasks are queued, wasting an entire core even when the server is fully idle.sync()has the same problem — pure spin on an atomic load.This replaces the busy-wait loops with a
std::condition_variablewait/notify pattern:worker():cv.wait()with predicate when queue is empty (was: unconditional spin-trylock loop)sync():cv.wait()with predicate on pending count (was:while(pending > n);spin)enqueue(): mutex lock-unlock +cv.notify_one()to wake the idle worker~TaskQueue(): mutex-guardeddoneflag +cv.notify_all()for clean shutdownThe mutex only guards CV sleep/wake transitions — the lock-free linked-list enqueue path is preserved. The lock-unlock serialization pattern prevents the classic lost-wakeup race where a notification fires between a predicate check and the
wait()call.Before fix:
sglang::schedulthread at 99.8% CPU when idle.After fix: All threads at 0.0% CPU when idle.
Test plan
run_suite.py --hw cpu --suite default— 9/9 tests pass (accuracy + benchmarks)pidstat -tconfirms 0% CPU on all threads when idle (was 99.8%)