Unify deps makefile target

[DiegoCivi]

Unify deps makefile target

Description

Tested this on mac and linux by doing make deps and then make tests. It worked on both.

Closes #2097

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.426 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 23.782 s, System: 0.641 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.419 s … 24.433 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.562 s ±  0.053 s    [User: 23.923 s, System: 0.635 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.525 s … 24.600 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.322 s ±  0.012 s    [User: 24.027 s, System: 0.647 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.314 s … 13.331 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.291 s ±  0.001 s    [User: 24.015 s, System: 0.613 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.290 s … 13.291 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.505 s ±  0.048 s    [User: 36.360 s, System: 0.738 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.471 s … 10.539 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.229 s ±  0.073 s    [User: 36.297 s, System: 0.706 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.178 s … 10.281 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.03 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.198 s ±  0.182 s    [User: 36.477 s, System: 0.740 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.069 s … 10.326 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.935 s ±  0.020 s    [User: 36.699 s, System: 0.745 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.920 s …  9.949 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.03 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.883 s ±  0.218 s    [User: 37.223 s, System: 0.775 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.729 s … 10.038 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.997 s ±  0.066 s    [User: 37.175 s, System: 0.779 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.951 s … 10.044 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.955 s ±  0.038 s    [User: 37.244 s, System: 0.854 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.928 s …  9.982 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.044 s ±  0.281 s    [User: 37.301 s, System: 0.819 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.846 s … 10.243 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.012 ± 0.034	1.969	2.072	1.01 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	1.992 ± 0.024	1.963	2.042	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	1.908 ± 0.018	1.887	1.945	1.00
head big_fibonacci	1.923 ± 0.025	1.895	1.980	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.916 ± 0.132	6.749	7.220	1.00 ± 0.02
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.897 ± 0.091	6.750	7.031	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.034 ± 0.021	2.014	2.086	1.00
head compare_arrays_200000	2.043 ± 0.015	2.016	2.062	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.345 ± 0.005	1.335	1.352	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.364 ± 0.011	1.350	1.387	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.159 ± 0.012	1.143	1.178	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.156 ± 0.012	1.142	1.173	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	6.979 ± 0.098	6.846	7.118	1.00
head integration_builtins	6.987 ± 0.090	6.857	7.096	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.150 ± 0.082	6.961	7.249	1.00 ± 0.02
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.150 ± 0.074	6.962	7.199	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.037 ± 0.012	2.016	2.054	1.00 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.027 ± 0.025	1.998	2.069	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.407 ± 0.006	1.400	1.423	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.414 ± 0.013	1.396	1.428	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.382 ± 0.016	1.359	1.412	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.388 ± 0.018	1.364	1.430	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.142 ± 0.013	1.122	1.159	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.143 ± 0.014	1.129	1.180	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.441 ± 0.004	1.433	1.448	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.457 ± 0.010	1.442	1.481	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	513.6 ± 2.3	510.9	517.9	1.00 ± 0.01
head pedersen	512.5 ± 2.8	507.9	516.4	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	585.6 ± 10.8	578.1	615.4	1.01 ± 0.02
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	582.7 ± 4.6	577.2	590.8	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.708 ± 0.013	1.695	1.736	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.716 ± 0.013	1.703	1.746	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	629.7 ± 5.7	624.1	642.2	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	631.5 ± 7.0	624.0	643.1	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	3.917 ± 0.028	3.868	3.945	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	3.936 ± 0.071	3.875	4.112	1.00 ± 0.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.69%. Comparing base (2f8c8a0) to head (4f0b767).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2211   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.69%   96.69%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines       44023    44023           
=======================================
  Hits        42567    42567           
  Misses       1456     1456           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM!

[gabrielbosio]

Looks good but I would also remove the make deps-macos mention in the README