[DNM] Bump MacOS version used in CI job

[gabrielbosio]

This job is being cancelled due to the following error:

This is a scheduled macos-13 brownout. The macOS-13 based runner images are being deprecated. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/13046.
--
The macOS-13 based runner images are being deprecated, consider switching to macOS-15 (macos-15-intel) or macOS 15 arm64 (macos-latest) instead. For more details see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/13046

Here's the link to the related issue for easier access.

This PR fix this issue by bumping the MacOS version used in the failing CI job.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     22.807 s ±  0.063 s    [User: 21.915 s, System: 0.888 s]
  Range (min … max):   22.762 s … 22.852 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     22.748 s ±  0.017 s    [User: 21.853 s, System: 0.891 s]
  Range (min … max):   22.735 s … 22.760 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.263 s ±  0.066 s    [User: 21.940 s, System: 0.914 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.217 s … 12.310 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.183 s ±  0.033 s    [User: 21.796 s, System: 0.927 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.159 s … 12.206 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.688 s ±  0.147 s    [User: 34.736 s, System: 1.115 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.584 s …  9.792 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.572 s ±  0.324 s    [User: 34.485 s, System: 1.104 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.343 s …  9.802 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.633 s ±  0.100 s    [User: 34.761 s, System: 1.132 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.562 s …  9.704 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.598 s ±  0.016 s    [User: 34.680 s, System: 1.129 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.586 s …  9.609 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.534 s ±  0.157 s    [User: 35.138 s, System: 1.145 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.422 s …  9.645 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.542 s ±  0.281 s    [User: 35.055 s, System: 1.112 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.344 s …  9.741 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.00 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.449 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 35.538 s, System: 1.206 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.433 s …  9.465 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.667 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 35.161 s, System: 1.216 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.659 s …  9.674 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	1.946 ± 0.015	1.932	1.985	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	1.944 ± 0.006	1.937	1.954	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	1.874 ± 0.034	1.854	1.970	1.01 ± 0.02
head big_fibonacci	1.864 ± 0.009	1.849	1.877	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.596 ± 0.060	6.521	6.676	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.631 ± 0.158	6.527	7.051	1.01 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.001 ± 0.016	1.978	2.027	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	1.991 ± 0.015	1.974	2.027	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.338 ± 0.007	1.325	1.347	1.00 ± 0.01
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.336 ± 0.009	1.325	1.347	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.123 ± 0.016	1.107	1.158	1.01 ± 0.02
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.115 ± 0.006	1.109	1.125	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	6.697 ± 0.097	6.632	6.925	1.00
head integration_builtins	6.744 ± 0.061	6.648	6.801	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	6.713 ± 0.061	6.662	6.808	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	6.810 ± 0.065	6.713	6.910	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	1.978 ± 0.013	1.963	1.996	1.00
head linear_search	2.011 ± 0.057	1.969	2.101	1.02 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.417 ± 0.004	1.410	1.420	1.00 ± 0.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.416 ± 0.005	1.409	1.425	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.364 ± 0.006	1.356	1.375	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.365 ± 0.004	1.356	1.372	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.128 ± 0.011	1.119	1.155	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.128 ± 0.004	1.123	1.134	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.445 ± 0.008	1.434	1.454	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.451 ± 0.012	1.436	1.475	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	505.1 ± 1.5	503.1	508.1	1.00
head pedersen	505.8 ± 1.6	504.1	509.1	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	584.4 ± 2.5	579.0	587.7	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	585.5 ± 3.0	581.2	592.4	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.715 ± 0.011	1.708	1.736	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.717 ± 0.011	1.704	1.735	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	647.8 ± 1.5	646.2	650.4	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	648.8 ± 2.1	645.8	651.6	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	3.811 ± 0.032	3.777	3.852	1.00 ± 0.01
head uint256_integration_benchmark	3.809 ± 0.038	3.772	3.875	1.00

[gabrielbosio]

Closing and opening a clone to see if Install on macos-13 doesn't get spawned after clearing the cache

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.95%. Comparing base (2def725) to head (7ae8ab5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2263   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.95%   95.95%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines       36593    36593           
=======================================
  Hits        35113    35113           
  Misses       1480     1480           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.