@@ -2347,7 +2347,7 @@ \subsubsection{System preparation}
23472347Therefore, to make the walls less hydrophilic, the value of $ \epsilon _\text {O-WALL}$
23482348was reduced.
23492349
2350- The \flecmd {parameters.inc} file also contains the following two lines:
2350+ Finally, the \flecmd {parameters.inc} file contains the following two lines:
23512351\ begin{lstlisting}
23522352bond_coeff O-H 0 0.9572
23532353angle_coeff H-O-H 0 104.52
@@ -2732,38 +2732,48 @@ \subsubsection{Imposed shearing}
27322732the water, the walls, and the ions, respectively. With values of \lmpcmd {10 15000 200000},
27332733the velocity \lmpcmd {vx} will be evaluated every 10 steps during the final 150,000
27342734steps of the simulations. The result will be averaged and printed only once at the 200,000\, th step.
2735- Run the simulation using LAMMPS. The averaged velocity and density
2736- profiles of the fluid are plotted in Fig.~\ref {fig:NANOSHEAR-profiles }.
2737- As expected for such Couette flow geometry, the fluid velocity increases linearly along $ z$ .
2735+ Run the simulation using LAMMPS. The averaged velocity
2736+ profile for the fluid is plotted in Fig.~\ref {fig:NANOSHEAR-profiles }.
2737+ As expected for such Couette flow geometry, the fluid velocity increases
2738+ linearly along $ z$ , and is equal to the walls velocities at the fluid-solid
2739+ interfaces (no-slip boundary conditions).
27382740
27392741\begin {figure }
27402742\centering
27412743\includegraphics [width=\linewidth ]{NANOSHEAR-profiles}
2742- \caption {a) Water density $ \rho $ along the $ z$ -axis as
2743- simulated in \hyperref [sheared-confined-label]{Tutorial 4}.
2744- b) Velocity profiles for water (blue) and walls
2745- (orange) along the $ z$ -axis.}
2744+ \caption {Velocity profiles for water (blue) and walls (orange) along the $ z$ -axis as
2745+ simulated in \hyperref [sheared-confined-label]{Tutorial 4}.}
27462746% The line is a linear fit assuming
27472747% that the pore size is $h = 1.8\,\text{nm}$.}
27482748\label {fig:NANOSHEAR-profiles }
27492749\end {figure }
27502750
27512751From the force applied by the fluid on the solid, one can extract the stress
27522752within the fluid, which enables the measurement of its viscosity $ \eta $
2753- according to $ \eta = \tau / \dot {\gamma }$ where $ \tau $ is the stress applied by
2753+ according to
2754+ \begin {equation }
2755+ \eta = \tau / \dot {\gamma }
2756+ \label {eq:eta }
2757+ \end {equation }
2758+ where $ \tau $ is the stress applied by
27542759the fluid on the shearing wall, and $ \dot {\gamma }$ the shear rate
27552760\cite {gravelle2021violations }. Here, the shear rate is
2756- approximately $ \dot {\gamma } = 16 \cdot 10 ^9 \, \text {s}^{-1}$ , and using a
2757- surface area of $ A = 6 \cdot 10 ^{-18}\, \text {m}^2 $ , one obtains an estimate for
2758- the shear viscosity for the confined fluid of $ \eta = 6.6 \, \text {mPa.s}$ . The
2759- viscosity calculated at such a high shear rate may differ from the expected
2761+ approximately $ \dot {\gamma } = 20 \cdot 10 ^9 \, \text {s}^{-1}$ (Fig.~\ref {fig:NANOSHEAR-profiles }),
2762+ the average force on each wall is given by \lmpcmd {f\_ mysf1[1]} and \lmpcmd {f\_ mysf2[1]}
2763+ and is approximately $ 2.7 \, \mathrm {kcal/mol/\AA }$ in magnitude. Using a surface area
2764+ for the walls of $ A = 6 \cdot 10 ^{-18}\, \text {m}^2 $ , one obtains an estimate for
2765+ the shear viscosity for the confined fluid of $ \eta = 3.1 \, \text {mPa.s}$ using Eq.~\eqref {eq:eta }.
2766+
2767+ \begin {note }
2768+ The viscosity calculated at such a high shear rate may differ from the expected
27602769\emph {bulk } value. In general, it is recommended to use a lower value for the
27612770shear rate. Note that for lower shear rates, the ratio of noise-to-signal is
27622771larger, and longer simulations are needed. Another important point to consider
27632772is that the viscosity of a fluid next to a solid surface is typically larger
27642773than in bulk due to interaction with the walls~\cite {wolde -kidanInterplayInterfacialViscosity2021 }.
27652774Therefore, one expects the present simulation to yield a viscosity that is slightly
27662775higher than what would be measured in the absence of walls.
2776+ \end {note }
27672777
27682778\subsection {Tutorial 5: Reactive silicon dioxide }
27692779\label {reactive-silicon-dioxide-label }
0 commit comments