feat(evals): add LLM-powered failure analysis to eval CI#2454
Open
Maahir Sachdev (maahir30) wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Open
feat(evals): add LLM-powered failure analysis to eval CI#2454Maahir Sachdev (maahir30) wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Maahir Sachdev (maahir30) wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When evals fail in CI, it's often unclear why from the raw pass/fail counts alone. This adds a lightweight post-eval step that uses an LLM to analyze each failure's trajectory and produce a human-readable explanation, surfaced directly in the GitHub Actions summary.
What changed:
Reporter extension (
libs/evals/tests/evals/pytest_reporter.py): The pytest reporter now captures per-test failure details (test name, category, failure message including the agent trajectory) into afailureslist inevals_report.json. Only populated for failures — zero overhead on passing runs.Analysis script (
.github/scripts/analyze_eval_failures.py): A new script that reads the failures from the report, sends each one to an LLM (Claude Haiku by default) for analysis viaasyncio.gather(all failures analyzed in parallel), and writes the results to$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARYand afailure_analysis.jsonartifact. Exits immediately with zero cost when there are no failures.CI workflow (
.github/workflows/evals.yml): Two new steps in the eval job — one to run the analysis script, one to upload the analysis artifact. Uses the existingANTHROPIC_API_KEYsecret, no new secrets needed.