Skip to content

Conversation

@Yeuoly
Copy link
Contributor

@Yeuoly Yeuoly commented Jan 1, 2026

Description

Please provide a brief description of the changes made in this pull request.
Please also include the issue number if this is related to an issue using the format Fixes #123 or Closes #123.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Refactor
  • Performance improvement
  • Other

Essential Checklist

Testing

  • I have tested the changes locally and confirmed they work as expected
  • I have added unit tests where necessary and they pass successfully

Bug Fix (if applicable)

  • I have used GitHub syntax to close the related issue (e.g., Fixes #123 or Closes #123)

Additional Information

Please provide any additional context that would help reviewers understand the changes.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 1, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Yeuoly, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the security posture of the Docker image by updating the busybox utility. By forcing a refresh and upgrade of busybox during the image build, it ensures that the container environment benefits from the latest security patches and bug fixes for these essential tools, thereby reducing potential vulnerabilities.

Highlights

  • Busybox Update: The busybox package has been explicitly updated to its latest version in the docker/serverless.dockerfile.
  • Security Improvement: This update is applied in both the builder and final alpine stages of the Docker image build process to enhance security by ensuring core utilities are current.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to improve security by updating the busybox package in the Dockerfile. While this is a good initiative, the current implementation uses an invalid command option (--force-refresh with apk add), which will cause the Docker build to fail. My review provides critical feedback with corrected and more efficient commands to properly update the package index and upgrade busybox while installing the other necessary packages. These changes will ensure the build succeeds and follows Docker best practices for package management in Alpine-based images.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the plugin-daemon label Jan 1, 2026
@Yeuoly Yeuoly requested a review from 41tair January 1, 2026 09:04
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jan 1, 2026
@Yeuoly Yeuoly merged commit 0d1c3ab into main Jan 2, 2026
7 checks passed
@Yeuoly Yeuoly deleted the fix/busybox-cve branch January 2, 2026 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer plugin-daemon size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants