Open
Conversation
|
Nice addition. Having the same $depth behavior as Arr::flatten() makes the API more consistent and gives more control when working with partially flattened structures. I can see this being useful in several cases. |
Contributor
|
Mirrors |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Arr::flatten()has a$depthparameter to control how deep it goes butArr::dot()always flattens everything. this adds the same$depthparameter toArr::dot()for consistency.Usage
also works on collections:
default value is
INFso existing usage is not affected.