Add initial documentation for project structure and coding guidelines #15
Conversation
- Created .cursor/rules/code-organization.mdc to outline the core functionality utility functions tests and configuration mechanisms of the project. - Added .cursor/rules/coding-patterns
- Updated the model selection choices to include a new option: gpt-4o. - This addition allows users to select the gpt-4
WalkthroughThis update introduces a comprehensive suite of documentation and configuration files for a multi-agent, task-driven development system and the "Git GPT Commit" project. Additions include detailed workflow guides, rule and coding standards, language preferences, PRD templates, architectural and operational rules for custom AI modes, configuration examples, and enhanced Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant Config
participant OpenAI_API
User->>CLI: Run model configuration command
CLI->>User: Show model selection prompt (now includes "gpt-4o")
User->>CLI: Selects "gpt-4o"
CLI->>Config: Save selected model ("gpt-4o")
Note over CLI,Config: Model configuration updated
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.cursor/rules/development-workflow.mdc (1)
1-53: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove duplicate documentation or merge with
.rooversion
This doc largely duplicates.roo/rules/development-workflow.md. To avoid drift and reduce maintenance overhead, consolidate into a single source of truth or clearly differentiate their purposes.
🧹 Nitpick comments (51)
.roo/rules/roo_rules.md (1)
7-59: Well-structured rule guidelines with minor grammar suggestionsThe content provides excellent guidance for rule creation and maintenance with clear examples and formatting instructions.
Consider these minor improvements:
- Add examples from actual codebase + Add examples from the actual codebase🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~50-~50: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...w patterns emerge - Add examples from actual codebase - Remove outdated patterns ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~57-~57: After the auxiliary verb ‘do’, use the base form of a verb. Did you mean “example”?
Context: ...s concise - Include both DO and DON'T examples - Reference actual code over theoreti...(AUXILIARY_DO_WITH_INCORRECT_VERB_FORM)
.env.example (2)
1-8: Recommend adding.envusage instructions
Consider adding a brief header explaining how to consume this template (for example, “Copy this file to.envand installdotenvor configure your environment loader”) so users know how to activate these variables at runtime.
2-8: Add missing Azure endpoint variable placeholder
You mention thatAZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY“requires endpoint in .taskmasterconfig,” but it may be clearer to provide anAZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINTplaceholder here (or reference the exact key name) so users know which env var to set for Azure deployments..cursor/rules/language.mdc (2)
1-5: Populate frontmatter metadata
Thedescription:andglobs:frontmatter keys are empty—consider specifying a concise description of this rule and appropriate file globs (e.g.,["**/*.js", "**/*.md"]) so that the rule engine can correctly apply it.
28-33: Minor punctuation and scope clarification
- Add a period at the end of the last guideline line.
- Consider clarifying that “Follow JavaScript best practices and ES Module syntax” applies only to JavaScript source files.
.roo/rules/project-overview.md (1)
1-5: Populate frontmatter metadata
Thedescription:andglobs:frontmatter keys are blank—please provide a short summary (e.g., “High-level introduction to git-gpt-commit”) and appropriate file globs so this document is discoverable and applied by your tooling..roo/rules/code-organization.md (2)
1-5: Populate frontmatter metadata
The frontmatter keysdescription:andglobs:are empty—consider filling them in to describe the document’s purpose and to specify which files the rule applies to.
31-32: Reference the.env.exampletemplate
Rather than a generic mention of “Environment variables (.env file) for the OpenAI API key,” link to or reference your newly added.env.exampleso users know the exact variable names and formats..cursor/rules/code-organization.mdc (2)
1-5: Populate frontmatter metadata
Thedescription:andglobs:fields in the frontmatter are empty—please add descriptive metadata and glob patterns to ensure the cursor rules system picks up this document correctly.
12-16: Consider DRY for duplicate documentation
This.mdcfile mirrors.roo/rules/code-organization.md. To avoid content drift, you might centralize shared sections or use an include mechanism so that updates propagate to both versions..cursor/rules/project-overview.mdc (1)
1-5: Fill in front-matter metadata
Thedescriptionandglobsfields are currently empty. Please provide a concise summary indescriptionand specify matching file patterns inglobs, or remove unused fields if they’re not required by your tooling..roo/rules/development-workflow.md (2)
1-5: Populate or remove front-matter fields
Thedescriptionandglobsfront-matter entries are placeholders. Either fill them with appropriate values or omit these lines if they’re not consumed by your documentation generator.
46-48: Clarify Husky config path
The linkmdc:.husky/_/is unclear (what does_refer to?). If the intent is to point at the Husky hook scripts directory, update it to.husky/or specify the exact filenames.scripts/example_prd.txt (2)
24-29: Correct grammar: use past participle “built”
The phrase “needs to be build” is missing the past participle. Apply this diff:- - Do not think about timelines whatsoever -- all that matters is scope and detailing exactly what needs to be build in each phase so it can later be cut up into tasks + - Do not think about timelines whatsoever -- all that matters is scope and detailing exactly what needs to be built in each phase so it can later be cut up into tasks🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~29-~29: The past participle is required after “to be”.
Context: ... and detailing exactly what needs to be build in each phase so it can later be cut up...(BE_VBP_IN)
1-2: Consider using a Markdown extension for ease of reading
Renaming this file to.md(e.g.,example_prd.md) would enable better rendering in GitHub and local editors..roo/rules/coding-patterns.md (5)
1-5: Populate or remove front-matter metadata
Thedescriptionandglobsentries are empty. Please supply meaningful values or delete unused front-matter to avoid confusion.
13-20: Add import of Commander.js before usingprogram
The CLI snippet usesprogrambut doesn’t show its import. For clarity, include:+const { program } = require('commander');before the snippet.
27-29: Show import for OpenAI client
The OpenAI integration example must include its import. For example:+const { OpenAI } = require('openai');
53-75: Include requiredfs,path, andosimports in config snippets
The configuration examples usefs.existsSync,fs.readFileSync,path.join, andos.homedir()but omit imports. Add at the top of the snippet:+const fs = require('fs'); +const os = require('os'); +const path = require('path');
82-87: Importpromptsbefore use
The user prompt example relies on thepromptslibrary. Prepend:+const prompts = require('prompts');to the snippet for completeness.
.taskmasterconfig (1)
28-29: Replace placeholder Azure OpenAI URL with documentation reference.The Azure OpenAI base URL contains a placeholder ("your-endpoint") which needs to be customized by users. Consider adding a comment or replacing with documentation reference.
- "azureOpenaiBaseUrl": "https://your-endpoint.openai.azure.com/" + "azureOpenaiBaseUrl": "https://your-endpoint.openai.azure.com/", + "azureOpenaiBaseUrlComment": "Replace with your Azure OpenAI endpoint from the Azure portal".roo/rules/self_improve.md (1)
53-58: Minor grammatical fix needed.In line 57, the adjective "up-to-date" should be hyphenated when used as an adjective before a noun.
- Rules should be actionable and specific - Examples should come from actual code - - References should be up to date + - References should be up-to-date - Patterns should be consistently enforced🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~57-~57: It appears that hyphens are missing in the adjective “up-to-date”.
Context: ...om actual code - References should be up to date - Patterns should be consistently enf...(UP_TO_DATE_HYPHEN)
.cursor/rules/self_improve.mdc (2)
48-52: Minor grammatical fix needed.In line 51, the adjective "up-to-date" should be hyphenated when used as an adjective before a noun.
- Rules should be actionable and specific - Examples should come from actual code - - References should be up to date + - References should be up-to-date - Patterns should be consistently enforced
72-72: Fix indentation for consistency.The final line about following the cursor_rules.mdc document is not properly indented to match the bullet point pattern.
- Document breaking changes -Follow [cursor_rules.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdc) for proper rule formatting and structure. + - Follow [cursor_rules.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdc) for proper rule formatting and structure..roo/rules-test/test-rules (2)
2-3: Remove redundant directive line for concisenessLines 2 & 3 both state “Adhere strictly to the rules defined below.” Repeating the same directive twice adds noise without improving clarity.
-# 1. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. -# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. +# 1. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. +# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message.
5-8: Use proper Markdown headings to aid navigationThe bold text in line 1 (
**Core Directives & Agentivity:**) renders as a paragraph, not a heading. Converting these section titles (Core Directives…,Execution Role…, etc.) to##-level (or similar) headings makes the lengthy ruleset easier to skim and anchor-link.-**Core Directives & Agentivity:** +## Core Directives & AgentivityRepeat for other top-level sections.
.roo/rules-debug/debug-rules (2)
2-3: Deduplicate repeated directiveSame redundancy as in Test rules: the phrase “Adhere strictly to the rules defined below.” appears twice. Trim one copy to keep the numbered list accurate.
50-61: Align Taskmaster init check with file-system abstractionThe strategy suggests using
list_filesto test fortasks/tasks.json. If the repo root differs (monorepo, sub-dir agent), this relative path may break. Recommend parameterising the base path or checking both./tasks/tasks.jsonand$PROJECT_ROOT/tasks/tasks.json..windsurfrules (2)
74-88: Fence indentation inside triple-backtick breaks Markdown renderingThe task-file template block (lines 74-88) is indented two spaces under a list item, causing GitHub to treat it as plain text rather than code. Remove the leading spaces or add a language tag:
- ``` +```txt # Task ID: <id> … - ``` +```Improves readability in rendered docs.
320-337: Shell-command regex example is too liberal; risk of false positivesThe grep pattern
export (function|const) \w+|function \w+\(matches many internal helpers and even commented code. Adding start-of-line anchors and word boundaries reduces noise:grep -E "^(export (function|const) \w+|function \w+\()" --include="*.js" -r ./.roo/rules/dev_workflow.md (4)
1-5: Front-matter glob is overly broad
globs: **/*will make this rule match literally every file in the repo.
If that is intentional, add a short comment that clarifies the intent; otherwise, narrow the glob (e.g.globs: .roo/**).-globs: **/* +# Applies to all Task Master rule/guide files +globs: .roo/**
40-41: Missing hyphen – “view-specific” compound adjectiveLine 40 reads “View specific task details”.
When “view specific” is used as a modifier, style guides recommend a hyphen (“view-specific task details”) to avoid ambiguity.- View specific task details using `get_task` / `task-master show <id>` + View-specific task details using `get_task` / `task-master show <id>`🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~40-~40: When ‘View-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...s/ directory or asking for user input - View specific task details usingget_task/ `task-m...(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
57-60: Superlative needs article“Focus on tasks with highest complexity scores” → “with the highest complexity scores”.
- Focus on tasks with highest complexity scores (8-10) for detailed breakdown + Focus on tasks with the highest complexity scores (8-10) for detailed breakdown🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~59-~59: A determiner may be missing.
Context: ...readable version. - Focus on tasks with highest complexity scores (8-10) for detailed b...(THE_SUPERLATIVE)
222-229: Add missing back-ticks around shell patternThe
rgcommand example will eat the pipe symbol unless the pattern is quoted.
Recommend wrapping the pattern in back-ticks or single quotes for copy-paste friendliness.- `rg "export (async function|function|const) \w+"` + `rg 'export (async function|function|const) \\w+'`.roo/rules-code/code-rules (2)
1-4: Duplicate clause – remove repeated wordingLines 2 & 3 both end with “Adhere strictly to the rules defined below.” – the repetition distracts from the otherwise concise directives.
-# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. +# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message.
24-27: Clarify rare direct Taskmaster updatesBullet 26 mentions “Direct Updates (Rare)” but doesn’t describe how to do this safely.
Consider adding a one-line reminder to useuse_mcp_tool set_task_statuswith explicit IDs to avoid accidental status drift.
This small addition will help future contributors..roo/rules-architect/architect-rules (2)
1-4: Same duplication as Code-mode rulesThe “Adhere strictly …” sentence is also duplicated here.
Applying the same removal keeps the style consistent across rule files.
85-93: YAML indentation nit
mode_triggersuses two-space indentation while the rest of the doc is four.
Uniform indentation improves readability and avoids copy-paste mistakes for those re-using the snippet..roo/rules-ask/ask-rules (1)
2-4: Duplicate directive produces noise and hurts maintainabilityLines 2 – 4 repeat the “Adhere strictly to the rules defined below” sentence twice. Consider deleting one of them to keep the core directives concise.
-# 1. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. -# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. +# 1. Adhere strictly to the rules defined below. +# 2. Use tools sequentially, one per message..roo/rules-boomerang/boomerang-rules (1)
2-4: Same directive duplicated; drop the second instanceAs with Ask-mode rules, the sentence “Adhere strictly to the rules defined below.” appears twice (lines 2-3). Removing the duplicate keeps the header tight and avoids future divergence when editing one copy but not the other.
.roomodes (2)
40-44: Typo indebugmoderoleDefinitionweakens professionalism
The sentence contains “another mdode” instead of “another mode”.-... When activated by another mdode, your task is to... +... When activated by another mode, your task is to...
17-26: Over-restrictive edit permission on Architect may block non-markdown outputs
Architectis limited to editing only “\.md$” files. When it needs to generate architecture sketches as, e.g.,.mmd/.svgdiagrams or update a JSON config, it will be denied. Consider either:-["edit", { "fileRegex": "\\.md$", ... }] +["edit", { "fileRegex": "\\.(md|mmd|json|svg)$", ... }]or grant plain
"edit"if fine-grained restrictions are unnecessary..roo/rules/taskmaster.md (2)
38-42: Minor wording & casing fix improves clarity
Current text:Once complete, you MUST parse a prd in order to generate tasks.
Recommendations:
- Capitalise the acronym for consistency (
PRD).- Drop “in order” for brevity.
-Once complete, you _MUST_ parse a prd in order to generate tasks. +Once complete, you _MUST_ parse a PRD to generate tasks.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~40-~40: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...* Once complete, you MUST parse a prd in order to generate tasks. There will be no tasks ...(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
352-357: Rephrase “after making changes” sentence for conciseness“Run this after making changes to tasks.json to keep individual task file(s) up to date.”
Consider:
“Run after updating
tasks.jsonto regenerate the individual task files.”Saves six words and still conveys intent.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~356-~356: Consider shortening or rephrasing this to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...le `) - Usage: Run this after making changes to tasks.json to keep individual task file...(MAKE_CHANGES)
scripts/prd.txt (2)
11-14: Model list already outdated—addgpt-4oor use non-exhaustive phrasing
OpenAI’s newest public modelgpt-4ois absent. Either append it or change wording:-Integration with various OpenAI models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4) +Integration with OpenAI models (e.g., gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4, gpt-4o)Keeps documentation current and future-proof.
45-48: Avoid acronym tautology “CLI Interface”
“CLI” already includes “Interface”. Recommend replacing “CLI Interface” → “Command-line interface” or simply “CLI”.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~45-~45: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ...mmand-line options via Commander.js 4. CLI Interface - Commander.js for command-line argu...(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
[uncategorized] ~47-~47: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...arsing - Custom Git commands through Git extension mechanism 5. OpenAI Integrat...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
.cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc (5)
1-5: Include atitlefield in the YAML front matter
For tooling that consumes front matter, adding atitlefield can improve navigation and consistency. Suggest:--- +title: Task Master Development Workflow description: Guide for using Task Master to manage task-driven development workflows globs: **/* alwaysApply: true ---
15-19: Use relative paths formdc:links within the same directory
Links like[mcp.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/mcp.mdc)and[taskmaster.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/taskmaster.mdc)could be simplified to[mcp.mdc](mdc:mcp.mdc)and[taskmaster.mdc](mdc:taskmaster.mdc)for better maintainability when files are moved within.cursor/rules. Please verify that the tooling supports relativemdc:links.
87-99: Align field naming conventions in task structure
The properties listed mix casing styles (e.g.,testStrategyis camelCase, while other fields are lower-case). Confirm the actual JSON schema uses camelCase, or consider standardizing on snake_case (e.g.,test_strategy) to improve consistency across the project.
119-122: Convert key warnings into callout/admonition blocks
The important notes—“Non-API key settings are no longer configured via environment variables” and the guidance on verifying API keys—would stand out more if formatted as markdown callouts (e.g.,> **Note:**or::: warning). Consider refactoring these into admonition blocks for better readability.
157-206: Split the iterative implementation section into structured subsections
The “Iterative Subtask Implementation” section spans many steps and nested lists. Breaking it into clearly named subsections (e.g., Preparation, Planning, Execution, Logging, Review) would significantly improve readability and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
.cursor/rules/code-organization.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/coding-patterns.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/development-workflow.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/language.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/project-overview.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/self_improve.mdc(1 hunks).cursor/rules/taskmaster.mdc(1 hunks).env.example(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks).roo/rules-architect/architect-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules-ask/ask-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules-boomerang/boomerang-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules-code/code-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules-debug/debug-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules-test/test-rules(1 hunks).roo/rules/code-organization.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/coding-patterns.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/dev_workflow.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/development-workflow.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/language.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/project-overview.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/roo_rules.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/self_improve.md(1 hunks).roo/rules/taskmaster.md(1 hunks).roomodes(1 hunks).taskmasterconfig(1 hunks).windsurfrules(1 hunks)index.js(1 hunks)scripts/example_prd.txt(1 hunks)scripts/prd.txt(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
scripts/example_prd.txt
[grammar] ~29-~29: The past participle is required after “to be”.
Context: ... and detailing exactly what needs to be build in each phase so it can later be cut up...
(BE_VBP_IN)
.roo/rules/roo_rules.md
[uncategorized] ~50-~50: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...w patterns emerge - Add examples from actual codebase - Remove outdated patterns ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~57-~57: After the auxiliary verb ‘do’, use the base form of a verb. Did you mean “example”?
Context: ...s concise - Include both DO and DON'T examples - Reference actual code over theoreti...
(AUXILIARY_DO_WITH_INCORRECT_VERB_FORM)
.roo/rules/taskmaster.md
[style] ~40-~40: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...* Once complete, you MUST parse a prd in order to generate tasks. There will be no tasks ...
(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
[uncategorized] ~153-~153: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ....(CLI:--skip-generate) - file: Path to your Taskmaster 'tasks.json' file. Default relies on auto-detection.` (CL...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~162-~162: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...Key Parameters/Options: - from: `Required. The ID of the first task Taskmaster should update. All tasks with this ID or higher that ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[uncategorized] ~237-~237: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...eration is in progress. ### 14. Expand All Tasks (expand_all) - MCP Tool: `...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
[style] ~356-~356: Consider shortening or rephrasing this to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...le `) - Usage: Run this after making changes to tasks.json to keep individual task file...
(MAKE_CHANGES)
scripts/prd.txt
[style] ~45-~45: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ...mmand-line options via Commander.js 4. CLI Interface - Commander.js for command-line argu...
(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
[uncategorized] ~47-~47: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...arsing - Custom Git commands through Git extension mechanism 5. OpenAI Integrat...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~158-~158: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ...mmand-line options via Commander.js 4. CLI Interface - Commander.js for command-line argu...
(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
[uncategorized] ~160-~160: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...arsing - Custom Git commands through Git extension mechanism 5. OpenAI Integrat...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
.roo/rules/dev_workflow.md
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: Possible missing article found.
Context: ... outlines the typical process for using Task Master to manage software development p...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_A)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...rimary Interaction: MCP Server vs. CLI Task Master offers two primary ways to inter...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...compared to CLI parsing. - Refer to mcp.md for deta...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~40-~40: When ‘View-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...s/ directory or asking for user input - View specific task details using get_task / `task-m...
(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~59-~59: A determiner may be missing.
Context: ...readable version. - Focus on tasks with highest complexity scores (8-10) for detailed b...
(THE_SUPERLATIVE)
[uncategorized] ~65-~65: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...ty report if found, otherwise generates default number of subtasks. - Use `--num=<numbe...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...AI for research-backed expansion. - Add --force flag to clear existing subtasks...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~71-~71: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... generated subtasks as necessary. - Use expand_all tool or `task-master expand ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~76-~76: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...plementation differs significantly from planned approach - When future tasks need modif...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: Did you mean “?”?
Context: ...rk and why (to avoid repeating mistakes). - Specific code snippets or confi...
(QUESTION_MARK)
[uncategorized] ~206-~206: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...on. - Create new or update existing rules following internal guidelines (previous...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
.roo/rules/self_improve.md
[uncategorized] ~57-~57: It appears that hyphens are missing in the adjective “up-to-date”.
Context: ...om actual code - References should be up to date - Patterns should be consistently enf...
(UP_TO_DATE_HYPHEN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.roo/rules/taskmaster.md
257-257: Spaces inside code span elements
null
(MD038, no-space-in-code)
257-257: Spaces inside code span elements
null
(MD038, no-space-in-code)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
.roo/rules/language.md (1)
7-37: LGTM! Well-structured language guidelinesThe language preferences are comprehensive and clearly defined, covering both code standards and supported languages for commit messages. The guidelines are actionable and align well with the project's internationalization approach.
.gitignore (1)
25-41: LGTM! Well-organized ignore patternsThe added ignore patterns are properly categorized with clear section comments. The additions follow gitignore best practices by grouping related patterns together.
.roo/rules/roo_rules.md (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-defined rule metadataThe YAML front matter is correctly populated with a clear description, appropriate glob pattern, and explicit always-apply setting.
.cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdc (1)
1-53: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive rule guidelinesThe document provides excellent guidance for Cursor rule creation and maintenance with a consistent structure, clear examples, and best practices that align with the project's documentation standards.
index.js (1)
148-148: LGTM! Added GPT-4o model optionThe addition of GPT-4o as the first model option aligns with the default model specified on line 14 and enhances the CLI's model selection capabilities.
.roo/rules/project-overview.md (1)
13-16: Verify link syntax
This file usesmdc:prefixes in links (e.g.,[index.js](mdc:index.js)), which may not resolve in standard markdown viewers. Confirm that your documentation generator supports this scheme or update to relative paths (e.g.,[index.js](../../index.js))..cursor/rules/coding-patterns.mdc (4)
8-19: LGTM! Clear CLI pattern documentation.The Command Line Interface section effectively demonstrates the standard pattern for using Commander.js to implement CLI functionality.
21-45: LGTM! Comprehensive OpenAI API integration pattern.This section clearly outlines the standard pattern for OpenAI API integration, covering client initialization, message preparation, API requests with appropriate parameters, and response extraction.
47-74: LGTM! Well-structured configuration management pattern.The configuration management section documents a robust pattern for handling JSON configuration, including safe loading from the user's home directory and merging new values with existing config.
76-92: LGTM! Clear user prompts pattern documentation.The user prompts section effectively demonstrates how to use the prompts library for interactive CLI input, with proper access to user responses.
.taskmasterconfig (1)
5-7:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the model IDs reference valid Claude models.
The modelId "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219" contains a date (20250219) that appears to be in the future. This might be a placeholder or incorrectly formatted date.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if this is a valid model ID or known naming convention for Anthropic models echo "Searching for documentation about Anthropic Claude model naming conventions..." curl -s "https://docs.anthropic.com/claude/docs/models-overview" | grep -A 10 "claude-3" || echo "Could not find information about model naming in primary docs" echo "Checking if this appears to be a placeholder based on repository patterns..." grep -r "claude.*[0-9]\{8\}" --include="*.json" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" . || echo "No similar patterns found in codebase"Length of output: 720
Validate the configured Anthropic Claude model ID
I wasn’t able to find any reference to a model named “claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219” in Anthropic’s public docs or elsewhere in the codebase. Please confirm that this identifier is correct—if it’s a placeholder or typo, replace it with one of the officially supported Claude model IDs (see https://docs.anthropic.com/claude/docs/models-overview).
• File:
.taskmasterconfigLines 5–7"modelId": "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219", "maxTokens": 120000, "temperature": 0.2• Action:
- Verify via the Anthropic API or official model list that this exact modelId exists
- If it does not, update to a valid Claude model name
.roo/rules/self_improve.md (5)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured frontmatter.The frontmatter correctly defines the purpose of this guideline document and ensures it applies to all files in the project.
7-21: LGTM! Clear rule improvement triggers and analysis process.This section effectively outlines what should trigger rule improvements and the systematic analysis process to follow.
23-37: LGTM! Well-defined criteria for rule updates.The document clearly specifies when to add new rules or modify existing ones, with specific thresholds like "used in 3+ files" that make the guidance actionable.
38-51: LGTM! Helpful pattern recognition example.The code example effectively illustrates how to identify patterns that should be standardized in rules.
60-80: LGTM! Comprehensive improvement, deprecation, and documentation guidelines.These sections provide clear guidance on continuous improvement practices, rule deprecation procedures, and documentation update requirements.
.cursor/rules/self_improve.mdc (4)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured frontmatter.The frontmatter correctly defines the purpose of this guideline document for Cursor rules and ensures it applies to all files.
7-33: LGTM! Clear improvement triggers and update criteria.This section effectively outlines what should trigger rule improvements and provides specific criteria for when to add or modify rules.
34-46: LGTM! Helpful pattern recognition example.The code example effectively illustrates how to identify patterns that should be standardized in the Cursor rules.
61-72: LGTM! Comprehensive improvement, deprecation, and documentation guidelines.These sections provide clear guidance on continuous improvement practices, rule deprecation procedures, and documentation update requirements.
.roo/rules-debug/debug-rules (1)
16-21: Guardrail: require explicit confirmation forexecute_commandcallsThe bullet permits
execute_commandonly if explicitly instructed, but the mandatory “user confirmation after EACH tool use” (line 4) could stall automated debug sessions for long-running commands. Consider clarifying:
- acceptable timeout or auto-retry policy
- whether “user” means the human initiator or Boomerang
Explicit guidance prevents deadlocks in CI-like environments.
.windsurfrules (1)
16-26: Package name mismatch: clarifytask-mastervsclaude-task-masterLine 18 instructs
npm install -g claude-task-masterbut later commands usetask-master. If the published binary name differs from the package name, explicitly state it (e.g., “the packageclaude-task-masterinstalls thetask-masterCLI”). Avoids confusion for first-time users..cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc (1)
40-43: Verify referenced test strategy document exists
The link totests.mdcat(mdc:.cursor/rules/tests.mdc)should be confirmed. Ensure that atests.mdcfile actually exists (instead oftasks.mdc) in the.cursor/rulesdirectory to avoid broken links.
.roo/rules/language.md
Outdated
| --- | ||
| description: | ||
| globs: | ||
| alwaysApply: false | ||
| --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve the YAML front matter by adding description and globs
The YAML front matter is missing the description and globs values, which should be populated to properly describe the rule and specify which files it applies to.
---
-description:
-globs:
+description: Language preferences and guidelines for code, documentation, and commit messages.
+globs: **/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,md,mdx}
alwaysApply: false
---📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| --- | |
| description: | |
| globs: | |
| alwaysApply: false | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| description: Language preferences and guidelines for code, documentation, and commit messages. | |
| globs: **/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,md,mdx} | |
| alwaysApply: false | |
| --- |
| - Generates commit messages based on staged changes | ||
| - Supports multiple GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4) | ||
| - Supports multiple languages for commit messages | ||
| - Configuration saved to user's home directory |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include newly supported gpt-4o model
The project now offers the gpt-4o option but it’s not listed under "Main Features". Update the models list to reflect this addition, e.g.:
- - Supports multiple GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4)
+ - Supports multiple GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4, gpt-4o)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - Generates commit messages based on staged changes | |
| - Supports multiple GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4) | |
| - Supports multiple languages for commit messages | |
| - Configuration saved to user's home directory | |
| - Generates commit messages based on staged changes | |
| - Supports multiple GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4, gpt-4o) | |
| - Supports multiple languages for commit messages | |
| - Configuration saved to user's home directory |
.roo/rules/development-workflow.md
Outdated
| --- | ||
| description: | ||
| globs: | ||
| alwaysApply: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # Development Workflow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unify directory structure and file extensions
This file lives under .roo/rules with a .md extension, whereas similar docs are in .cursor/rules/*.mdc. Consider consolidating to a single directory and extension format for consistency (e.g., all under .cursor/rules/*.mdc).
| description: | ||
| globs: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Complete the frontmatter metadata fields.
The description and globs fields in the frontmatter are empty. These should be completed to properly define when and where these patterns should be applied.
---
-description:
-globs:
+description: Standard coding patterns for CLI, OpenAI API, configuration and user prompts
+globs: **/*.js
alwaysApply: true
---Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
.roo/rules-test/test-rules
Outdated
| 4. **Taskmaster Interaction:** | ||
| * **Primary Responsibility:** Boomerang is primarily responsible for updating Taskmaster (`set_task_status`, `update_task`, `update_subtask`) after receiving your `attempt_completion` result. | ||
| * **Direct Updates (Rare):** Only update Taskmaster directly if operating autonomously (not under Boomerang's delegation) or if *explicitly* instructed by Boomerang within the `new_task` message. | ||
| 5. **Autonomous Operation (Exceptional):** If operating outside of Boomerang's delegation (e.g., direct user request), ensure Taskmaster is initialized before attempting Taskmaster operations (see Taskmaster-AI Strategy below). | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
*Add lightweight YAML front-matter like other .roo/rules files
debug-rules and the Windsurf rules use a standard
---
description: …
globs: …
alwaysApply: …
---block. Including the same minimal metadata here (e.g., description, glob) keeps formatting consistent and lets automated parsers treat every rules file uniformly.
.windsurfrules
Outdated
| --- | ||
| DEV_WORKFLOW | ||
| --- | ||
| description: Guide for using meta-development script (scripts/dev.js) to manage task-driven development workflows | ||
| globs: **/* | ||
| filesToApplyRule: **/* | ||
| alwaysApply: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add global YAML front-matter for uniform parsing
Other rule artefacts (.roo/*) begin with a YAML header. Starting this file the same way (even if only description/alwaysApply) lets tooling index all rules consistently.
+---
+description: Central development workflow & self-improvement rulebook
+globs: .windsurfrules
+alwaysApply: true
+---Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| * `OLLANA_API_KEY` (Requires `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` too) | ||
| * **Endpoints (Optional/Provider Specific inside .taskmasterconfig):** | ||
| * `AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT` | ||
| * `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` (Default: `http://localhost:11434/api`) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in environment-variable name will break configuration
OLLANA_API_KEY should be OLLAMA_API_KEY (double “m”). A misspelled variable name prevents the CLI from picking up the key and silently disables Ollama requests.
- * `OLLANA_API_KEY` (Requires `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` too)
+ * `OLLAMA_API_KEY` (Requires `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` too)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * `OLLANA_API_KEY` (Requires `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` too) | |
| * **Endpoints (Optional/Provider Specific inside .taskmasterconfig):** | |
| * `AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT` | |
| * `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` (Default: `http://localhost:11434/api`) | |
| * `OLLAMA_API_KEY` (Requires `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` too) | |
| * **Endpoints (Optional/Provider Specific inside .taskmasterconfig):** | |
| * `AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT` | |
| * `OLLAMA_API_KEY` (Default: `http://localhost:11434/api`) |
| * `id`: `The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., '15' or '16,18'. Required unless using `all`.) (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`) | ||
| * `all`: `Tell Taskmaster to remove subtasks from all parent tasks.` (CLI: `--all`) | ||
| * `file`: `Path to your Taskmaster 'tasks.json' file. Default relies on auto-detection.` (CLI: `-f, --file <file>`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unbalanced parentheses / back-ticks make this bullet hard to read
The sentence ends with ...) leaving an extra parenthesis after the back-tick-quoted word all. Markdown renderers will show the extra “)` and the closing back-tick can disappear depending on the renderer.
-* `id`: `The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., '15' or '16,18'. Required unless using `all`.) (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`)
+* `id`: The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., `15` or `16,18`. Required unless using **--all**. (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * `id`: `The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., '15' or '16,18'. Required unless using `all`.) (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`) | |
| * `all`: `Tell Taskmaster to remove subtasks from all parent tasks.` (CLI: `--all`) | |
| * `file`: `Path to your Taskmaster 'tasks.json' file. Default relies on auto-detection.` (CLI: `-f, --file <file>`) | |
| * `id`: The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., `15` or `16,18`. Required unless using **--all**. (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`) | |
| * `all`: `Tell Taskmaster to remove subtasks from all parent tasks.` (CLI: `--all`) | |
| * `file`: `Path to your Taskmaster 'tasks.json' file. Default relies on auto-detection.` (CLI: `-f, --file <file>`) |
| "roleDefinition": "You are Roo, a strategic workflow orchestrator who coordinates complex tasks by delegating them to appropriate specialized modes. You have a comprehensive understanding of each mode's capabilities and limitations, also your own, and with the information given by the user and other modes in shared context you are enabled to effectively break down complex problems into discrete tasks that can be solved by different specialists using the `taskmaster-ai` system for task and context management.", | ||
| "customInstructions": "Your role is to coordinate complex workflows by delegating tasks to specialized modes, using `taskmaster-ai` as the central hub for task definition, progress tracking, and context management. \nAs an orchestrator, you should:\nn1. When given a complex task, use contextual information (which gets updated frequently) to break it down into logical subtasks that can be delegated to appropriate specialized modes.\nn2. For each subtask, use the `new_task` tool to delegate. Choose the most appropriate mode for the subtask's specific goal and provide comprehensive instructions in the `message` parameter. \nThese instructions must include:\n* All necessary context from the parent task or previous subtasks required to complete the work.\n* A clearly defined scope, specifying exactly what the subtask should accomplish.\n* An explicit statement that the subtask should *only* perform the work outlined in these instructions and not deviate.\n* An instruction for the subtask to signal completion by using the `attempt_completion` tool, providing a thorough summary of the outcome in the `result` parameter, keeping in mind that this summary will be the source of truth used to further relay this information to other tasks and for you to keep track of what was completed on this project.\nn3. Track and manage the progress of all subtasks. When a subtask is completed, acknowledge its results and determine the next steps.\nn4. Help the user understand how the different subtasks fit together in the overall workflow. Provide clear reasoning about why you're delegating specific tasks to specific modes.\nn5. Ask clarifying questions when necessary to better understand how to break down complex tasks effectively. If it seems complex delegate to architect to accomplish that \nn6. Use subtasks to maintain clarity. If a request significantly shifts focus or requires a different expertise (mode), consider creating a subtask rather than overloading the current one.", | ||
| "groups": [ | ||
| "read", | ||
| "edit", | ||
| "browser", | ||
| "command", | ||
| "mcp" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Referenced “code” mode is not actually defined
Boomerang’s instructions enumerate the specialized modes Architect, Test, Debug, Ask, Code, yet the JSON lists only five modes and omits code. If downstream tooling expects that slug, runtime look-ups or switch_mode calls will fail.
Action: add a code entry (or rename an existing one) mirroring the permissions you intend for implementation work.
.roo/rules/taskmaster.md
Outdated
| - **Description:** `Remove all subtasks from one or more specified Taskmaster parent tasks.` | ||
| - **Key Parameters/Options:** | ||
| - `id`: `The ID(s) of the Taskmaster parent task(s) whose subtasks you want to remove, e.g., '15' or '16,18'. Required unless using `all`.) (CLI: `-i, --id <ids>`) | ||
| - `all`: `Tell Taskmaster to remove subtasks from all parent tasks.` (CLI: `--all`) | ||
| - `file`: `Path to your Taskmaster 'tasks.json' file. Default relies on auto-detection.` (CLI: `-f, --file <file>`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unbalanced parenthesis & MD038 violation inside code-span sentence
Required unless using \all`.)` has an unmatched right‐paren and a space inside the back-ticked word, triggering markdown-lint.
-`id`: `The ID(s) ... Required unless using `all`.)
+`id`: `Required. ID(s) …` (omit the stray parenthesis)
_or_
+`id`: The ID(s)… **Required unless you pass `--all`.**This also removes the space in the inline-code to satisfy MD038.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
257-257: Spaces inside code span elements
null
(MD038, no-space-in-code)
257-257: Spaces inside code span elements
null
(MD038, no-space-in-code)
- Implemented default name handling in the greet function setting Guest as the default when no name is provided. - Updated JSDoc to reflect the new behavior of the
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
tests/README.md (1)
15-25: Add language specification to code blockThe fenced code block showing folder structure should have a language specified for proper syntax highlighting and to comply with Markdown standards.
-``` +```text tests/ ├── README.md - This document ├── .env.test - Environment variables for testing ├── .env.test.example - Sample environment variables file ├── index.test.js - Main functionality tests ├── setup.js - Test environment setup helpers ├── setup-mocks.js - Mocks setup └── utils/ └── mocks.js - Mock utility functions<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> 15-15: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified null (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>tests/setup-mocks.js (2)</summary><blockquote> `24-25`: **Consider translating Japanese comment to English** There's a non-English comment at line 24 ("index.jsモジュール全体をモック"). For consistency and improved collaboration, it's better to maintain all comments in a single language throughout the codebase. ```diff -// index.jsモジュール全体をモック +// Mock the entire index.js module
102-119: Consider a more robust command matching approachThe current implementation uses string inclusion checks (command.includes) which could match unintended substrings. Consider using a more precise matching strategy like regular expressions or exact command matching.
execSync: vi.fn((command) => { if (typeof command === 'string') { - // git statusコマンドの場合は変更があるとみなす - if (command.includes('git status')) { + // Consider changes exist when git status command is executed + if (/^git status( |$)/.test(command)) { return Buffer.from('M file1.js') } - // git commitコマンドの場合はモック応答 - if (command.includes('git commit')) { + // Mock response for git commit command + if (/^git commit( |$)/.test(command)) { return Buffer.from('Commit successful') } }tests/index.test.js (1)
27-72: Consider extracting test data to fixture filesThe test data for file modifications (lines 33-61) is quite large and could be better maintained as external fixture files. This would make the test more readable and easier to maintain.
You could store the test content in fixtures and load it:
- modifyAndStageFile( - filePath, - ` - /** - * Sample function - * @param {string} name The name - * @returns {string} Greeting message - */ - function greet(name) { - // Add default value for when name is empty - const userName = name || 'Guest'; - return \`Hello, \${userName}!\`; - } - - /** - * Calculate the sum of numbers - * @param {number[]} numbers Array of numbers - * @returns {number} Sum value - */ - function sum(numbers) { - return numbers.reduce((total, num) => total + num, 0); - } - - /** - * Export public functions - */ - module.exports = { - greet, - sum - }; - `, - ) + const testContent = fs.readFileSync( + path.join(projectRoot, 'fixtures', 'test-content-1.js'), + 'utf8' + ) + modifyAndStageFile(filePath, testContent)tests/setup.js (2)
95-99: Translate Japanese comment to EnglishFor consistency and improved collaboration, translate the Japanese comment to English.
- // テスト後にディレクトリを削除 + // Delete the directory after the test
42-79: Simplify project root detection logicThe project root detection logic is somewhat complex. Consider using a package like
find-upto simplify this common operation.+import findUp from 'find-up' export function copyFixture(fixtureName, destName = fixtureName) { - // Find the project root by looking for package.json up the directory tree - let projectRoot = process.cwd() - let currentPath = projectRoot - - // Keep going up until we find package.json or hit the root - while (!fs.existsSync(path.join(currentPath, 'package.json'))) { - const parentPath = path.dirname(currentPath) - if (parentPath === currentPath) { - // We've reached the root and didn't find package.json - break - } - currentPath = parentPath - } - - if (fs.existsSync(path.join(currentPath, 'package.json'))) { - projectRoot = currentPath - } + // Find the project root + const packageJsonPath = findUp.sync('package.json') + const projectRoot = packageJsonPath ? path.dirname(packageJsonPath) : process.cwd()tests/utils/mocks.js (1)
54-63: Enhance mockUserInput to handle exhausted responsesCurrently, when all predefined responses are used, the function defaults to returning
false. Consider throwing an error in this case to detect unexpected calls, which could indicate a test problem.export function mockUserInput(responses) { let callIndex = 0 return vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => { if (callIndex < responses.length) { return Promise.resolve({ value: responses[callIndex++] }) } - return Promise.resolve({ value: false }) + throw new Error(`Unexpected call to mockUserInput: all ${responses.length} predefined responses have been used`) }) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
fixtures/expected/commit_message_example.txt(1 hunks)fixtures/file1.js(1 hunks)fixtures/file2.js(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)tests/.env.test(1 hunks)tests/.env.test.example(1 hunks)tests/README.md(1 hunks)tests/index.test.js(1 hunks)tests/setup-mocks.js(1 hunks)tests/setup.js(1 hunks)tests/utils/mocks.js(1 hunks)vitest.config.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- tests/.env.test.example
- fixtures/file1.js
- fixtures/file2.js
- tests/.env.test
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
tests/setup.js (2)
index.js (1)
dotenv(54-54)tests/index.test.js (1)
tempDir(13-13)
tests/index.test.js (1)
tests/setup.js (5)
tempDir(21-21)setupTestRepo(19-34)cleanupTestRepo(95-99)copyFixture(42-79)modifyAndStageFile(86-89)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
tests/README.md
15-15: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
package.json (1)
10-10: Improved test script command to be more explicitChanging from
vitesttovitest runmakes the test command more explicit and aligns with the broader testing enhancements in the project. This is a good practice as it clearly specifies the exact Vitest command being executed.fixtures/expected/commit_message_example.txt (1)
1-5: Well-structured commit message exampleThis fixture provides an excellent example of a conventional commit message with a clear type (feat), scope (user), and properly formatted bullet points describing the changes. It will serve as a good reference for testing commit message generation.
vitest.config.js (2)
2-2: Appropriate import for path moduleGood addition of the Node.js path module which will ensure cross-platform path handling for the setup files configuration.
8-9: Enhanced test configuration with setup files and mock resetThe additions of
setupFilespointing to setup-mocks.js and enablingmockResetare excellent testing practices that will:
- Ensure consistent test environment setup via the mocks file
- Prevent test pollution by resetting mocks between test runs
This will lead to more reliable and isolated tests.
tests/README.md (1)
1-133: Comprehensive test documentationThis README provides excellent documentation for the test environment, covering all essential aspects from setup to execution. It will be very valuable for contributors to understand how to work with the test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
15-15: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
tests/setup-mocks.js (2)
56-76: Well-structured filesystem mocksGood approach to partial mocking of the fs module, preserving actual behavior while intercepting specific paths. The mock config setup (model: 'gpt-4o', language: 'English') is appropriate for testing.
137-143: Good approach to process.exit mocking with error throwingThis is a smart way to handle process.exit in tests by throwing an error instead of actually exiting. This makes test failures more apparent and easier to debug.
tests/index.test.js (3)
15-25: Good test isolation practicesUsing beforeEach and afterEach hooks with setupTestRepo and cleanupTestRepo ensures proper test isolation. Clearing mocks between tests is also a good practice that prevents test cross-contamination.
155-163: Good error handling testThis test properly verifies that errors from the gptCommit function are propagated correctly, which is important for robust error handling in the application.
165-182: Well-designed user interaction testingThis test effectively verifies that the commit operation is skipped when the user cancels the confirmation. The approach of mocking the prompts module and then checking that execSync wasn't called with git commit is a good way to test this behavior.
tests/setup.js (1)
7-13: Good environment configuration with fallbackThe implementation correctly prioritizes test-specific environment variables (.env.test) while falling back to the project's main .env file. This allows tests to run with different configurations when needed.
tests/utils/mocks.js (2)
9-34: Well-structured OpenAI response mockThis function provides a realistic OpenAI response structure with customizable content and options. The default values represent a typical OpenAI response, which is good for testing.
92-103: Excellent command mocking approachThe
mockExecSyncfunction takes a flexible approach to mapping commands to outputs, supporting both static values and dynamic functions. This design makes it highly reusable across different test scenarios.
| getGitSummary: vi.fn((options) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| // 実際のdiffコマンドを実行せず、ファイルの変更があるかチェック | ||
| const gitStatus = require('child_process') | ||
| .execSync('git status --porcelain') | ||
| .toString() | ||
|
|
||
| if (!gitStatus.trim()) { | ||
| throw new Error('No changes to commit') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // モックされたdiffの内容を返す | ||
| return `diff --git a/file1.js b/file1.js\nindex 123456..789012 100644\n--- a/file1.js\n+++ b/file1.js\n@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@\nfunction greet(name) {\n- return \`Hello, \${name}!\`;\n+ // 名前が空の場合のデフォルト値を追加\n+ const userName = name || 'Guest';\n+ return \`Hello, \${userName}!\`;\n }` | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error('Failed to get git summary') | ||
| } | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Good implementation of getGitSummary mock, but check error handling
The mock intelligently checks for actual file changes before returning a result, which helps tests reflect real behavior. However, the error message from line 41 doesn't match the error thrown at line 35, which could confuse test debugging.
- throw new Error('Failed to get git summary')
+ throw error // Propagate the original error for better debugging📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| getGitSummary: vi.fn((options) => { | |
| try { | |
| // 実際のdiffコマンドを実行せず、ファイルの変更があるかチェック | |
| const gitStatus = require('child_process') | |
| .execSync('git status --porcelain') | |
| .toString() | |
| if (!gitStatus.trim()) { | |
| throw new Error('No changes to commit') | |
| } | |
| // モックされたdiffの内容を返す | |
| return `diff --git a/file1.js b/file1.js\nindex 123456..789012 100644\n--- a/file1.js\n+++ b/file1.js\n@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@\nfunction greet(name) {\n- return \`Hello, \${name}!\`;\n+ // 名前が空の場合のデフォルト値を追加\n+ const userName = name || 'Guest';\n+ return \`Hello, \${userName}!\`;\n }` | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to get git summary') | |
| } | |
| }), | |
| getGitSummary: vi.fn((options) => { | |
| try { | |
| // 実際のdiffコマンドを実行せず、ファイルの変更があるかチェック | |
| const gitStatus = require('child_process') | |
| .execSync('git status --porcelain') | |
| .toString() | |
| if (!gitStatus.trim()) { | |
| throw new Error('No changes to commit') | |
| } | |
| // モックされたdiffの内容を返す | |
| return `diff --git a/file1.js b/file1.js | |
| index 123456..789012 100644 | |
| --- a/file1.js | |
| +++ b/file1.js | |
| @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ | |
| function greet(name) { | |
| - return \`Hello, \${name}!\`; | |
| + // 名前が空の場合のデフォルト値を追加 | |
| + const userName = name || 'Guest'; | |
| + return \`Hello, \${userName}!\`; | |
| }` | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| - throw new Error('Failed to get git summary') | |
| + throw error // Propagate the original error for better debugging | |
| } | |
| }), |
| export function setupTestRepo() { | ||
| // Create a temporary directory | ||
| const tempDir = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `git-gpt-commit-test-${Date.now()}`) | ||
| fs.mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }) | ||
|
|
||
| // Initialize Git repository | ||
| process.chdir(tempDir) | ||
| execSync('git init') | ||
| execSync('git config user.name "Test User"') | ||
| execSync('git config user.email "[email protected]"') | ||
|
|
||
| // Create .env file (using actual API key) | ||
| fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=${process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY}`) | ||
|
|
||
| return tempDir | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential security issue with API key storage
Writing the actual API key to a file in the temporary test directory could pose a security risk if cleanup fails or if the temporary directory is accessible to other processes.
Consider using a fake/mock API key for tests:
- fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=${process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY}`)
+ fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=test_key_for_mocked_responses`)Or ensure cleanup happens even when tests fail by using try/finally blocks.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function setupTestRepo() { | |
| // Create a temporary directory | |
| const tempDir = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `git-gpt-commit-test-${Date.now()}`) | |
| fs.mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }) | |
| // Initialize Git repository | |
| process.chdir(tempDir) | |
| execSync('git init') | |
| execSync('git config user.name "Test User"') | |
| execSync('git config user.email "[email protected]"') | |
| // Create .env file (using actual API key) | |
| fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=${process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY}`) | |
| return tempDir | |
| } | |
| export function setupTestRepo() { | |
| // Create a temporary directory | |
| const tempDir = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `git-gpt-commit-test-${Date.now()}`) | |
| fs.mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }) | |
| // Initialize Git repository | |
| process.chdir(tempDir) | |
| execSync('git init') | |
| execSync('git config user.name "Test User"') | |
| execSync('git config user.email "[email protected]"') | |
| // Create .env file (using mock API key to avoid exposing real credentials) | |
| - fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=${process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY}`) | |
| + fs.writeFileSync('.env', `OPENAI_API_KEY=test_key_for_mocked_responses`) | |
| return tempDir | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
.gitignoreto cover more development, OS, and editor-specific files.Other