seup lint #18
seup lint #18
Conversation
- Updated .eslintrc.cjs to disable the no-unused-vars rule for test files located in tests//.js and utils//.test.js. -
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis update introduces ESLint and TypeScript configuration files, adds a GitHub Actions workflow for linting, and updates Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub
participant ActionsRunner
participant ESLint
Developer->>GitHub: Push or PR to main
GitHub->>ActionsRunner: Trigger lint workflow
ActionsRunner->>ActionsRunner: Checkout code
ActionsRunner->>ActionsRunner: Prepare environment (.github/actions/prepare)
ActionsRunner->>ESLint: Run pnpm lint
ESLint-->>ActionsRunner: Lint results
ActionsRunner-->>GitHub: Report status
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…e no changes - Modified the test case to expect getGitSummary to return null when there are no changes instead of throwing an error. - Updated the mock implementation
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tsconfig.json (1)
20-29: Refineincludeglob patterns for completeness
The patterns like"./**.js"may not behave as expected. Use standard globs ("**/*.js","**/*.ts", etc.) to ensure all files are picked up.Suggested update:
- "include": [ - "./**.js", - "./**.ts", - "./**.cjs", - "./**.mjs", + "include": [ + "**/*.js", + "**/*.ts", + "**/*.cjs", + "**/*.mjs", "fixtures/**/*.js", "tests/**/*.js", "utils/**/*.js", "utils/**/*.test.js" ]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.eslintignore(1 hunks).eslintrc.cjs(1 hunks).github/workflows/lint.yml(1 hunks)index.js(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)tests/index.test.js(2 hunks)tests/setup-mocks.js(2 hunks)tests/setup.js(1 hunks)tests/utils/mocks.js(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)utils/sanitizeCommitMessage.test.js(1 hunks)vitest.config.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: test
tests/index.test.js
[failure] 88-88: tests/index.test.js > Git GPT Commit > getGitSummary > throws an error when there are no changes
AssertionError: expected [AsyncFunction] to throw an error
- Expected:
null
- Received:
undefined
❯ tests/index.test.js:88:56
🪛 GitHub Actions: Test
tests/index.test.js
[error] 88-88: AssertionError: expected [AsyncFunction] to throw an error 'No changes to commit'. Test failed at line 88.
🔇 Additional comments (19)
vitest.config.js (1)
1-4: Formatting improvement: import ordering and spacing adjusted
The import ofdefineConfigis now grouped after Node built-in imports with appropriate blank lines, aligning with the project's ESLint import-order rules and enhancing readability.utils/sanitizeCommitMessage.test.js (1)
1-2: Formatting improvement: added blank line after imports
The blank line after the Vitest imports improves readability and matches the project's new linting style. No changes to test logic..eslintignore (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionFix ignore pattern for fixtures directory
The entry/fixturewill not match your actualfixturesdirectory (plural). Consider updating it to ignore the correct path and adding trailing slashes for directories.Proposed diff:
- /fixture + fixtures/Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
tests/setup.js (1)
4-5: Formatting improvement: blank line after built-ins
Grouping all Node.js built-in imports (child_process,fs,os,path) followed by a blank line before third-party imports (dotenv) enhances clarity and adheres to the new ESLint rules..github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
1-13: Well-structured GitHub Actions workflow for lintingThis workflow correctly sets up a CI process to run linting on PRs and pushes to main, using the project's lint script.
tests/index.test.js (1)
2-4: Improved import organizationThe imports are now better organized with a clear separation between modules.
index.js (3)
5-11: Improved import organizationImports are now logically grouped with standard libraries first, followed by third-party modules.
125-125: Better indication of unused parameterRenaming
argsto_argsclearly indicates this parameter is intentionally unused, following common naming conventions.
129-129: Cleaner code with removed redundant commentRemoving the outdated comment about manual command extraction improves code clarity since Commander is now handling this.
tests/utils/mocks.js (1)
57-57: Explicitly async implementationMaking the mock implementation explicitly asynchronous better reflects its behavior and aligns with the Promise-based return.
.eslintrc.cjs (2)
13-21: Good job handling test files differently.The override configuration correctly disables the no-unused-vars rule for test files, which is a good practice as test files often have variables that appear unused in certain test scenarios.
5-5:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the ts-prefixer preset covers all necessary rules.
The configuration extends 'ts-prefixer', but it's important to ensure this preset includes all the necessary rules for your project. Consider reviewing the preset's contents and adding any missing rules that are specific to your project's needs.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check what's included in the ts-prefixer preset npm explore eslint-config-ts-prefixer -- cat index.js # Alternatively, if it's a local file or doesn't have a simple index.js find node_modules/eslint-config-ts-prefixer -type f -name "*.js" | xargs catLength of output: 444
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that eslint-config-ts-prefixer is declared in package.json grep -R '"eslint-config-ts-prefixer"' -n package.json # Check if the package is installed under node_modules npm ls eslint-config-ts-prefixer || true # List the module directory to locate its entry point or rule definitions ls -R node_modules/eslint-config-ts-prefixer 2>/dev/nullLength of output: 2353
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Display the main configuration exported by ts-prefixer sed -n '1,200p' node_modules/eslint-config-ts-prefixer/index.cjsLength of output: 3591
Confirm ts-prefixer covers your project’s needs
Thets-prefixerpreset includes a comprehensive set of core ESLint rules plus TypeScript, import and Prettier plugins, but it doesn’t pull in any “recommended” rule sets out of the box. Please review whether you need additional rules or plugins for your codebase. For example, you might consider adding:
plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended(e.g. forno-floating-promises,explicit-module-boundary-types)plugin:import/recommendedorplugin:import/typescript(for stricter import validation)- Any project-specific rules around accessibility, security, or coding conventions
If you identify gaps, update your
.eslintrc.cjsaccordingly:extends: [ - 'ts-prefixer', + 'ts-prefixer', + 'plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended', + 'plugin:import/recommended', ],tests/setup-mocks.js (3)
27-27: Good use of underscore prefix for unused parameters.Prefixing unused parameters with an underscore (
_options) is a good practice that indicates the parameter is intentionally unused while suppressing linter warnings.
40-40: Good use of discard variable in catch block.Using
__as a discard variable in the catch block is appropriate when you don't need to use the error object itself but still need to catch exceptions.
44-44: Consistent use of underscore prefix for unused parameters.The change from
optionsto_optionswith default value maintains consistent naming conventions for unused parameters throughout the codebase.package.json (4)
11-12: Great addition of lint scripts.Adding dedicated scripts for linting and fixing issues simplifies the development workflow and ensures consistent code quality checks across the team.
42-50: Comprehensive ESLint and TypeScript setup.The added dependencies provide a complete setup for ESLint with TypeScript support, including necessary plugins for import handling and Prettier integration.
Also applies to: 54-54
10-10:Details
❌ Incorrect review comment
Changes to test script.
The test script was simplified to "vitest run". Ensure this doesn't remove any important options that were previously configured.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look at git history for previous version of the test script git show HEAD~1:package.json | grep -A2 "\"scripts\""Length of output: 147
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the entire scripts section from the previous commit git show HEAD~1:package.json | sed -n '/"scripts": {/,/}/p'Length of output: 305
No changes to
testscript detectedAfter reviewing the commit history, the
testentry inpackage.jsonremains"vitest run"in both the current and previous versions. There were no modifications to this script, so no further action is required.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
39-39:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify Node.js version compatibility.
The Volta configuration specifies Node.js version 22.15.0, which is very recent. Consider whether this might cause compatibility issues for team members or CI environments.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the latest LTS Node.js version for reference curl -s https://nodejs.org/dist/index.json | jq -r 'map(select(.lts != false)) | .[0].version' # Check if any packages have Node.js engine restrictions grep -r "\"engines\"" package.jsonLength of output: 186
I’m not seeing the package.json in the sandbox (likely due to
skip_cloning), so let’s pull it in and inspect theenginesand Volta fields directly:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Locate package.json in the repo fd --hidden --max-depth 2 'package.json' # Show any engines or volta config in package.json grep -R '"engines"' -n package.json || true grep -R '"volta"' -n package.json || true # Preview the first 100 lines of package.json sed -n '1,100p' package.jsonLength of output: 2025
Confirm Node.js 22.x support across your team and CI
The Volta config is pinning Node to v22.15.0 (package.json @ line 38), which is the current LTS—but it’s still a fairly new major release. Before locking everyone into this exact version, please:
- Verify that all CI workflows (e.g. GitHub Actions’
actions/setup-node, other build pipelines) support Node 22.x out of the box.- Confirm that all contributors are on a Volta version that can install v22.15.0 without issues.
- Consider adding an
"engines"field in package.json (e.g."node": ">=18 <25") instead of a fixed patch version to allow flexibility for minor/patch updates.- If broad compatibility is more important than the very latest LTS, you may want to target Node 20.x instead.
tests/index.test.js
Outdated
| expect(async () => gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()).toThrow( | ||
| 'No changes to commit', | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix async test assertion
The test is failing because wrapping an async function in another async function doesn't properly capture thrown errors in the way expect() requires.
Apply this diff to fix the async error assertion:
- expect(async () => gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()).toThrow(
- 'No changes to commit',
- )
+ await expect(gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()).rejects.toThrow(
+ 'No changes to commit'
+ )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| expect(async () => gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()).toThrow( | |
| 'No changes to commit', | |
| ) | |
| await expect(gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()).rejects.toThrow( | |
| 'No changes to commit' | |
| ) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test
[failure] 88-88: tests/index.test.js > Git GPT Commit > getGitSummary > throws an error when there are no changes
AssertionError: expected [AsyncFunction] to throw an error
- Expected:
null
- Received:
undefined
❯ tests/index.test.js:88:56
🪛 GitHub Actions: Test
[error] 88-88: AssertionError: expected [AsyncFunction] to throw an error 'No changes to commit'. Test failed at line 88.
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | |||
| module.exports = { | |||
| root: true, | |||
| env: {}, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Specify the execution environment in the ESLint configuration.
The env object is currently empty, but it should specify the execution environments for proper linting. For a Node.js project with tests, consider adding the appropriate environments.
- env: {},
+ env: {
+ node: true,
+ es2022: true,
+ jest: true
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| env: {}, | |
| env: { | |
| node: true, | |
| es2022: true, | |
| jest: true | |
| }, |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
Tests