[REL-4161] switch to printf to allow for backticks in CHANGELOG #523
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
launchdarkly-upra
bot
changed the title
sloloris
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
😩 please let this be the last one 😩
Using the heredoc was creating toil because the syntax is kinda fiddly and
workflow_dispatchis only available on main, so I needed to create a PR and get a review for every change. But in the end, usingprintfis better anyway because it allows for backticks, which bash will try to run if they appear inside an unquoted heredoc. We'll see if the CHANGELOG comes out looking okay, but cursor assures meprintfworks well for multiline content. 🤞Related Jira issue: REL-4161: Migrate ld-find-code-refs from Releaser to GHA