Skip to content

update node-forge to version 1.3.2#25

Merged
lenchv merged 1 commit intolenchv:masterfrom
rwe1941:Update_node-forge
Nov 27, 2025
Merged

update node-forge to version 1.3.2#25
lenchv merged 1 commit intolenchv:masterfrom
rwe1941:Update_node-forge

Conversation

@rwe1941
Copy link

@rwe1941 rwe1941 commented Nov 27, 2025

node-forge version 1.3.1 has a vulnerability of 8.6 (see CVE-2025-12816)
Updating to node-forge 1.3.2 will fix the issue.

"node-forge": "^1.3.1" in package.json is not working, because package-lock fixes the version to 1.3.1

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.62%. Comparing base (1745675) to head (24d7c71).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #25   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.62%   87.62%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         412      412           
=======================================
  Hits          361      361           
  Misses         51       51           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.62% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@lenchv lenchv merged commit 2a62b89 into lenchv:master Nov 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@lenchv
Copy link
Owner

lenchv commented Nov 27, 2025

@rwe1941 all good 🙌 published new version 🚀 thanks for the contribution 🤝

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants