Proposal: Lexicon and documentation for community.lexicon.location.place#64
Open
schuyler wants to merge 1 commit intolexicon-community:mainfrom
Open
Proposal: Lexicon and documentation for community.lexicon.location.place#64schuyler wants to merge 1 commit intolexicon-community:mainfrom
schuyler wants to merge 1 commit intolexicon-community:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's a proposed lexicon for geographic place information, which builds on the existing
community.lexicon.location.*types, and adds conventions for globally unique identifiers, naming schemes, vendor attributes, revision tracking, and concordance.My hope is that this provides a fairly complete means for ATProto devs to build location-aware applications that can work with place gazetteers, emit user-generated place descriptions, and reference places from other kinds of application records.
I realize this is a pretty chunky PR. I would love to have some real-time conversation and feedback on this proposal, if the Github PR comments aren't sufficient.