-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 418
Remove invoice_id
from static invoice server protocol
#4009
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
valentinewallace
wants to merge
7
commits into
lightningdevkit:main
Choose a base branch
from
valentinewallace:2025-08-simplify-static-inv-server
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+158
−162
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f0551f7
Follow-ups from removing async_payments cfg flag
valentinewallace 93644d2
Include invoice_slot in OfferPathsRequest message
valentinewallace 14b6ff6
Cache pending offer in specific invoice slot
valentinewallace dbe3514
Track invoice_slot in ServeStaticInvoice context
valentinewallace 2abd889
Remove now-unused ServeStaticInv::inv_slot from OM
valentinewallace 59b9163
Replace StaticInvoiceReq::invoice_id with ::inv_slot
valentinewallace d3c9a03
Remove now-unused ServeStaticInvoice::invoice_id
valentinewallace File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These option-in-option semantics get a bit hard to follow tbh. IMO it would be much more readable if we encapsulated
self.offers
into a dedicated helper object encapsulating theVec
and exposing 'proper' internal API methods that never leak the actual indexusize
.Such a wrapper type could also more clearly assert the invariants, i.e., that we can never get more than
u16::MAX
/MAX_CACHED_OFFERS_TARGET
entries?