-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
multiaddr[1/N]: serialize static address creation #1000
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hieblmi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors the staticaddr
manager to remove a mutex by serializing static address creation through a channel. This change aims to improve the concurrency model for address management by centralizing the creation logic within the Run
loop, making it more robust and easier to reason about.
Highlights
- Concurrency Model Refactor: Replaced
sync.Mutex
with a channel-based serialization mechanism for static address creation within theManager
. - Channel-based Request Handling: Introduced
request
andresponse
structs and arequests
channel to handle address creation requests asynchronously and serially within theManager
'sRun
loop. - API Adaptation: The public
NewAddress
method now sends requests to the internalRun
loop via the new channel and waits for the result, abstracting the serialization logic. - Internal Logic Encapsulation: The core logic for creating/retrieving static addresses was moved from
NewAddress
to a new private methodnewAddress
, which no longer requires explicit locking.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
Warning Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting |
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the address.Manager
to serialize static address creation using a channel instead of a mutex. While the intent is good, the implementation has a critical flaw: it spawns a new goroutine for each address request, which defeats the serialization and reintroduces a race condition. My review includes a critical comment with a suggested fix to correctly serialize the operation, though it also points out the performance trade-offs of the simple fix.
10fb146
to
c84589e
Compare
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the address manager to serialize static address creation using a channel and a worker goroutine, instead of a mutex. This is a good idiomatic change in Go that improves the concurrency model. The implementation is mostly correct, but I've found a high-severity issue where the worker goroutine is not panic-safe. A panic would crash the worker, making the address creation functionality unavailable until a restart. I've added a review comment with a suggestion to make the worker more robust by recovering from panics.
c84589e
to
2e2a28e
Compare
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the static address manager to serialize address creation using a channel and a worker goroutine, removing the need for a mutex. The changes are well-implemented and follow standard Go concurrency patterns. The use of a buffered response channel and context handling in select
statements makes the implementation robust against timeouts and cancellations. I have one suggestion to improve the structure and readability of the new addrWorker
function.
2e2a28e
to
d970363
Compare
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the address creation logic in staticaddr/address/manager.go
to use a channel for serialization instead of a mutex. This is a good architectural change that follows common Go concurrency patterns. The implementation is well-done, correctly handling context cancellations and potential panics in the worker goroutine. I have one suggestion to enhance panic logging for better debuggability.
d970363
to
47e30fc
Compare
47e30fc
to
47c147b
Compare
staticaddr/address/manager.go
Outdated
} | ||
}() | ||
|
||
addr, expiry, e := m.newAddress(req.ctx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why e
, not err
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
staticaddr/address/manager.go
Outdated
|
||
// handleAddrRequest is responsible for processing a single address request. | ||
func (m *Manager) handleAddrRequest(managerCtx context.Context, req request) { | ||
// If processing this request panics, we want to recover to process |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Panic means a bug in the code. I think it's better to crash the process so this doesn't go unnoticed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I actually agree, I've removed the recovery here.
47c147b
to
9d2b77d
Compare
In order to remove the mutex in
address/manager.go
we serialize address creation through a channel in the Run loop.