-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
gomod: update lnd v0.19.2-beta #986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hieblmi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on a routine maintenance task: updating the project's Go module dependencies. The core change involves upgrading the lnd library to its v0.19.2-beta release, which necessitated corresponding updates to other related btcsuite and lightninglabs modules. A minor code adjustment was also required to align with an API change in one of the updated client libraries.
Highlights
- Dependency Updates: I've updated the
lnddependency fromv0.19.0-betatov0.19.2-beta. This is the primary version bump in this pull request. - Related Module Bumps: Alongside the
lndupdate, I've also bumped several related Go modules, includinggithub.com/btcsuite/btclog/v2,github.com/btcsuite/btcwallet,github.com/lightninglabs/lndclient,github.com/lightninglabs/taproot-assets, andgithub.com/lightninglabs/taproot-assets/taprpcto their latest compatible versions. - API Signature Adjustment: To accommodate changes in the updated
lndclientlibrary, I've modified theRegisterSpendNtfnfunction signature ininstantout/reservation/actions_test.goandtest/chainnotifier_mock.goto include an optionallndclient.NotifierOptionparameter. - Indirect Dependency Removal: The
github.com/go-errors/errorsindirect dependency has been removed fromgo.modandgo.sum, indicating it's no longer required by the updated dependency tree.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates lnd to v0.19.2-beta and other related dependencies. The code changes in the test files are to adapt to the new dependency versions. I've found one issue in a test mock where not all function arguments are passed to m.Called, which could cause issues with tests. Otherwise, the changes look good.
| func (m *MockChainNotifier) RegisterSpendNtfn(ctx context.Context, | ||
| outpoint *wire.OutPoint, pkScript []byte, heightHint int32) ( | ||
| chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail, chan error, error) { | ||
| outpoint *wire.OutPoint, pkScript []byte, heightHint int32, | ||
| option ...lndclient.NotifierOption) (chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail, | ||
| chan error, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The mock implementation of RegisterSpendNtfn is not passing all of its arguments to m.Called on line 194. The new option parameter and the existing outpoint parameter are missing. This will cause test expectations that specify these arguments to fail.
To ensure the mock works correctly, all arguments should be passed to m.Called(). I recommend updating the function body to pass all arguments.
Here's a suggested implementation for the function body:
// Collect all arguments, including the variadic ones.
allArgs := []interface{}{ctx, outpoint, pkScript, heightHint}
for _, o := range option {
allArgs = append(allArgs, o)
}
args := m.Called(allArgs...)
return args.Get(0).(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail), args.Get(1).(chan error), args.Error(2)|
Closing in favor of #985 |
No description provided.