PR: Standardize Tool Configuration Documentation & Enhance Metrics, Husky Docs #93
Conversation
…cs/husky docs - Add standardized Tool Configuration Documentation Template (docs/config/tools.instructions.md) - Defines required sections for all config documentation - Ensures consistency across all tool configuration files - Includes sections for purpose, scope, scripts, failure modes, suppression, versioning, maintenance, ROI, and references - Enhance HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md with comprehensive documentation - Add detailed installation and setup instructions - Document pre-commit hook behavior and CI integration - Include bypass strategies and best practices - Add cross-references to related documentation - Enhance METRICS.md with detailed telemetry and metrics tracking - Define key metrics tracked (CI failures, PR cycle time, formatting churn, lint churn) - Document collection methods and telemetry policy - Add sample metrics report format - Include privacy-conscious approach to data collection - Enhance scripts/gather-metrics.js - Add detailed placeholder implementation - Document future integration with GitHub API via Octokit - Outline metrics collection methodology - Enhance scripts/verify-docs-commands.js - Improve error reporting with emoji indicators - Add support for additional documentation files - Better documentation of script purpose - Update docs/config/README.md - Reference new Tool Configuration Documentation Template - Update contributing guidelines to reference template - Add validation requirement for npm script references This standardization effort ensures all configuration documentation follows a uniform structure, making it easier for contributors and AI assistants to find information and maintain documentation consistency.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ashleyshaw has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Note
|
| Cohort / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Documentation: Husky & Metrics docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md, docs/METRICS.md |
Add YAML front matter; restructure and expand content into formal sections (status, rationale, installation, telemetry/metrics details, examples, related files); update dates, maintainers, and references. |
Configuration Docs Template & README docs/config/README.md, docs/config/tools.instructions.md |
Add a standardized tool-configuration documentation template and require its use via contributing guidance; add npm-script verification guidance and duplicate template guidance where applicable. |
Tooling Scripts scripts/gather-metrics.js, scripts/verify-docs-commands.js |
Expand gather-metrics.js with staged logging and TODO scaffolding for future GitHub API usage; refactor verify-docs-commands.js to read package.json, dynamically collect docs to check, extract npm script references (regex), skip missing files, and return non-zero on validation failures with clearer messages. |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Dev as verify-docs-commands.js
participant FS as File System
participant PKG as package.json
participant Doc as docs/*.md
participant Matcher as Regex Extractor
Dev->>FS: read package.json
FS-->>Dev: package.json content
Dev->>Doc: iterate documentation files list
alt file exists
Doc-->>Dev: file content
Dev->>Matcher: extract `npm run` references
Matcher-->>Dev: list of referenced scripts
Dev->>PKG: compare referenced scripts to package.json.scripts
alt missing scripts found
Dev-->>Dev: log error (file-specific), mark validation failure
else
Dev-->>Dev: log success for file
end
else file missing
Dev-->>Dev: skip file with notice
end
Dev->>Dev: exit 0 if all valid, else exit non-zero
Estimated code review effort
🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
- Pay special attention to:
- Regex correctness and edge cases in
scripts/verify-docs-commands.jswhen extracting npm script references. - Error and exit-path handling (non-zero on failures) in
verify-docs-commands.js. - Consistency of YAML front matter fields and date/maintainer formatting across
docs/*.md. - Duplication of template guidance in
docs/config/README.md(ensure intentional duplication or consolidate).
- Regex correctness and edge cases in
Possibly related PRs
- PR: Standardize Tool Configuration Documentation & Enhance Metrics, Husky Docs #93 — Overlapping edits to
docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md,docs/METRICS.md, config docs, and both scripts; likely a closely related or duplicate change set. - PR: Scaffold CI/CD Workflows, Pre-commit Hooks, Schema Validation, and Metrics for Project Foundation #74 — Touches the same docs and scripting around pre-commit/metrics scaffolding; may contain complementary updates.
- Set up GitHub repo documentation and governance #53 — Related documentation and governance updates that overlap with config and frontmatter changes.
Suggested labels
documentation, lang:md, lang:javascript, js, status:needs-review
Suggested reviewers
- krugazul
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The PR description is largely incomplete. While it includes a comprehensive bulleted summary of changes, the structured template sections (Linked Issues, Changelog, Risk Assessment, Testing Instructions, Checklist) are either empty or unfilled, failing to meet the repository's PR documentation requirements. | Complete the required template sections: specify linked issues, add changelog entries categorized as Added/Changed/Fixed/Removed, provide Risk Level and Mitigation Steps, include testing prerequisites and steps, and verify all checklist items are addressed. |
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The PR title 'Create documentation template for tool configuration' directly aligns with the primary change—introducing a new standardized documentation template (docs/config/tools.instructions.md) and updating related config documentation. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
ashleyshaw
requested review from
Copilot
and removed request for
eleshar and
krugazul
|
Please check the workflow logs for details and ensure all frontmatter follows the schema at See Frontmatter Documentation for guidance. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR establishes a standardized documentation framework for tool configuration files by creating a comprehensive template and enhancing existing documentation with detailed implementation guidance, metrics tracking, and cross-references.
Key changes:
- Created a standardized Tool Configuration Documentation Template defining required sections for all config documentation
- Enhanced existing documentation (HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md, METRICS.md) with comprehensive details on installation, behavior, and integration
- Improved documentation verification scripts with better error reporting and expanded file coverage
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
scripts/verify-docs-commands.js |
Refactored with improved error handling, emoji indicators, and support for additional documentation files (METRICS.md) |
scripts/gather-metrics.js |
Added comprehensive placeholder implementation with detailed TODO comments for future GitHub API integration via Octokit |
docs/config/tools.instructions.md |
New standardized template defining 9 required sections (Purpose, Scope, When It Runs, Exact Scripts, Severity & Failure Modes, Suppression & Ignoring, Version Pinning, Maintenance, ROI vs Cost, References) |
docs/config/README.md |
Updated to reference the new template and added validation requirement for npm script references |
docs/METRICS.md |
Expanded from 5 lines to 75 lines with detailed metrics definitions, collection methods, sample reports, and telemetry policy |
docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md |
Comprehensive rewrite from 90 to 106 lines with frontmatter, installation instructions, pre-commit behavior documentation, CI integration details, and setup commands |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| console.error(`❌ Doc reference to "npm run ${script}" not found in package.json scripts (${path.basename(docPath)})`); | ||
| allGood = false; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!allGood) { | ||
| console.error("Documentation references undefined npm scripts. 🚫"); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.log("👍 Docs scripts verification passed: all referenced scripts exist."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] Consider extracting the emoji indicators ('❌', '🚫', '👍') into named constants at the top of the file. This would improve maintainability if you need to change them later or support different output modes (e.g., plain text for CI logs without emoji support). Example:
const EMOJI_ERROR = '❌';
const EMOJI_BLOCKED = '🚫';
const EMOJI_SUCCESS = '👍';|
|
||
| ## Scope | ||
|
|
||
| Detail the **scope of files or domains** the tool covers. Include file globs or extensions (e.g. "applies to all `*.js` and `*.ts` files" for ESLint, or "all `*.md` docs and READMEs" for markdownlint). This should mirror any patterns in the tool's config or ignore files. If the config only applies to certain directories or file types, note that here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing closing period in the sentence "Detail the scope of files or domains the tool covers". For consistency with the rest of the documentation, this should end with a period. The sentence currently ends mid-thought without proper punctuation.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md(1 hunks)docs/METRICS.md(1 hunks)docs/config/README.md(1 hunks)docs/config/tools.instructions.md(1 hunks)scripts/gather-metrics.js(1 hunks)scripts/verify-docs-commands.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{js,ts}
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/*.{js,ts}: Review JavaScript/TypeScript for WordPress block theme:
- Ensure code is linted and follows project style guides.
- Validate use of ES modules or CommonJS as appropriate.
- Check for dead code, unused variables, and clear function naming.
- Ensure minimal JavaScript usage, following block theme best practices.
- Verify scripts enhance, not replace, native WordPress functionality.
- Check for proper script enqueueing in functions.php or block.json.
- Validate accessibility and performance optimizations.
- Ensure compatibility with WordPress script loading patterns.
- Confirm event handling, DOM manipulation, and editor/frontend compatibility.
- Check for code comments, modularity, and maintainability.
- Ensure tests are isolated and do not depend on external state.
- Check for descriptive test names and clear test structure.
Files:
scripts/gather-metrics.jsscripts/verify-docs-commands.js
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
scripts/verify-docs-commands.js (1)
.github/metrics/frontmatter-metrics.js (1)
__dirname(14-14)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontmatter Validation
docs/config/tools.instructions.md
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter validation failed: tag "file_type" must be string.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/config/tools.instructions.md
[style] ~45-~45: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ... and commit, so format issues should be fixed automatically."* ## Suppression & Igno...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
docs/METRICS.md
[style] ~32-~32: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... closed PRs' open-to-merge intervals. - For formatting churn: It scans merged PR di...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~33-~33: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...; we approximate via known patterns). - For lint rule churn: It looks at our ESLint...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...NG.md) — Linting strategy and tools - [.github/workflows/ci-metrics.yml](../.github/wo...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ools - .github/workflows/ci-metrics.yml — Metrics col...
(GITHUB)
docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md
[style] ~45-~45: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ... fails, the commit is aborted. You must fix the issues and try again. This prevents...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Agent
- GitHub Check: lychee
🔇 Additional comments (23)
docs/config/tools.instructions.md (1)
10-90: Excellent template structure!The template provides comprehensive guidance with well-defined sections covering all essential aspects of tool configuration documentation. This will ensure consistency across all configuration files and make it easier for contributors to document their configurations properly.
docs/config/README.md (2)
114-130: Good template integration.The Documentation Template section clearly describes the standardized structure and properly references the template file. The bulleted list of template sections provides a helpful overview.
135-140: Proper enforcement of documentation standards.The Contributing section correctly references the template and adds a validation requirement for npm script references. This aligns well with the enhanced verify-docs-commands.js script.
scripts/gather-metrics.js (2)
3-8: Clear placeholder documentation.The header comment effectively documents the script's intended purpose and future implementation approach using Octokit and the GitHub API.
10-31: Well-structured placeholder implementation.The enhanced logging and TODO comments provide clear scaffolding that aligns with the metrics defined in docs/METRICS.md. The stage-specific messages will make future implementation straightforward.
scripts/verify-docs-commands.js (5)
3-6: Clear script documentation.The header comment effectively describes the script's purpose.
11-17: Well-structured configuration.The path constants are properly defined using
path.joinfor cross-platform compatibility, and the DOC_FILES array makes it easy to extend validation to additional documentation files.
19-25: Proper error handling for package.json reading.The try-catch block ensures the script fails gracefully with a clear error message if package.json cannot be read or parsed.
27-42: Solid validation logic.The validation loop properly handles missing files, uses an appropriate regex pattern for matching npm script references, and provides clear error messages with emoji indicators and filenames.
44-49: Clear exit handling with helpful messages.The conditional exit logic uses appropriate exit codes and provides emoji-enhanced messages for both success and failure cases.
docs/METRICS.md (5)
1-8: Verify frontmatter schema consistency.Since the frontmatter validation is failing for tools.instructions.md due to a missing
file_typefield, this file may encounter the same issue.Please ensure that if
file_typeis required by the frontmatter validator, it should be added here as well:--- title: "Metrics & Telemetry" description: "Defining key quality metrics and our telemetry policy" last_updated: "2025-11-14" version: "1.0" maintainers: ["LightSpeed Engineering Ops"] tags: ["metrics", "telemetry", "CI", "analytics"] +file_type: "documentation" ---
16-24: Well-defined metrics with clear rationale.The key metrics are comprehensive and clearly explained, covering CI effectiveness, development velocity, code quality, and standards stability. Each metric has a clear purpose that aligns with the PR's quality improvement goals.
37-45: Helpful sample report format.The illustrative metrics report provides clear examples with interpretation notes, making it easy for readers to understand how to read and analyze the data.
47-56: Strong privacy-conscious telemetry policy.The telemetry policy clearly states that no personal data is collected, emphasizes opt-in for any future telemetry features, and demonstrates respect for developer privacy. This conservative approach builds trust.
26-35: No issues found.The workflow file
.github/workflows/ci-metrics.ymlexists in the repository, so the documentation reference is valid. The original concern is unfounded.docs/HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md (8)
1-8: Verify frontmatter schema consistency.Like the other documentation files, this may need a
file_typefield if the frontmatter validator requires it (as indicated by the pipeline failure for tools.instructions.md).Consider adding the file_type field if needed:
--- title: "Husky Pre-commit Hooks" description: "Using Husky to enforce quality gates (linting/tests) before commits" last_updated: "2025-11-14" version: "1.0" maintainers: ["LightSpeed DevOps"] tags: ["husky", "pre-commit", "automation", "linting"] +file_type: "documentation" ---
16-21: Clear status and rationale.The section effectively explains Husky's implementation status and provides strong justification for its use in catching issues early and reducing CI failures.
23-37: Comprehensive installation guidance.The installation section provides clear step-by-step instructions and includes helpful troubleshooting tips about Node version consistency and the
--no-verifyflag.
38-57: Detailed hook behavior explanation.The section clearly explains what happens during pre-commit, includes the actual script content for reference, and explains the failure handling mechanism. The use of code blocks makes it easy to understand.
62-69: Balanced guidance on bypassing hooks.The section appropriately explains bypass mechanisms while discouraging overuse and clearly stating the trade-offs. The rationale for excluding lengthy tests from pre-commit is sound.
71-79: Clear CI integration explanation.The section effectively explains the relationship between pre-commit hooks and CI, addressing why the apparent redundancy is intentional and beneficial. The "fail fast, locally" concept is well articulated.
80-92: Helpful maintainer reference.The setup commands section provides a useful historical reference for maintainers, showing the complete setup process and making it easier to replicate the configuration in other repositories.
94-101: Comprehensive cross-references.The Related Files section provides helpful links to all relevant documentation and configuration files, making it easy for readers to explore related topics.
| --- | ||
| title: "Tool Configuration Documentation Template" | ||
| description: "Standard format for documenting configuration files under docs/config" | ||
| last_updated: "2025-11-14" | ||
| version: "1.0" | ||
| maintainers: ["LightSpeed Team"] | ||
| tags: ["documentation", "configuration", "standards"] | ||
| --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix frontmatter validation error.
The pipeline validation is failing because the frontmatter is missing the required file_type field.
Apply this diff to add the missing field:
---
title: "Tool Configuration Documentation Template"
description: "Standard format for documenting configuration files under docs/config"
last_updated: "2025-11-14"
version: "1.0"
maintainers: ["LightSpeed Team"]
tags: ["documentation", "configuration", "standards"]
+file_type: "template"
---📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| --- | |
| title: "Tool Configuration Documentation Template" | |
| description: "Standard format for documenting configuration files under docs/config" | |
| last_updated: "2025-11-14" | |
| version: "1.0" | |
| maintainers: ["LightSpeed Team"] | |
| tags: ["documentation", "configuration", "standards"] | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| title: "Tool Configuration Documentation Template" | |
| description: "Standard format for documenting configuration files under docs/config" | |
| last_updated: "2025-11-14" | |
| version: "1.0" | |
| maintainers: ["LightSpeed Team"] | |
| tags: ["documentation", "configuration", "standards"] | |
| file_type: "template" | |
| --- |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontmatter Validation
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter validation failed: tag "file_type" must be string.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/config/tools.instructions.md around lines 1 to 8 the frontmatter is
missing the required file_type field which breaks pipeline validation; add a
file_type entry (e.g., file_type: "documentation" or the appropriate enum value
used by the repo) to the YAML frontmatter, placing it alongside
title/description/version and ensure proper YAML quoting/format to satisfy the
validator.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ash Shaw <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ash Shaw <[email protected]>
|
Please check the workflow logs for details and ensure all frontmatter follows the schema at See Frontmatter Documentation for guidance. |
1 similar comment
|
Please check the workflow logs for details and ensure all frontmatter follows the schema at See Frontmatter Documentation for guidance. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ash Shaw <[email protected]>
|
Please check the workflow logs for details and ensure all frontmatter follows the schema at See Frontmatter Documentation for guidance. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ash Shaw <[email protected]>
|
Please check the workflow logs for details and ensure all frontmatter follows the schema at See Frontmatter Documentation for guidance. |
ashleyshaw
deleted the
claude/config-docs-template-016SXALgwqRUX9zDYQMAuevf
branch
ashleyshaw
changed the title
2 participants
name: "Pull Request"
about: "General changes, refactors, and maintenance"
title: "PR: Standardize Tool Configuration Documentation & Enhance Metrics, Husky Docs"
labels: ["status:needs-review"]
General Pull Request
This PR delivers major documentation improvements and standardization for all tool configuration and supporting scripts in the repository.
Add standardized Tool Configuration Documentation Template
docs/config/tools.instructions.mdto define required structure for all configuration documentationEnhance HUSKY-PRECOMMITS.md
Expand METRICS.md documentation
Update scripts/gather-metrics.js
Update scripts/verify-docs-commands.js
Revise docs/config/README.md
tools.instructions.mdtemplate and updated contributing rulesThis effort ensures every configuration and supporting documentation follows a unified, contributor-friendly structure—making it easier for humans and AI to triage, search, and maintain documentation.
Linked issues
Closes #
Changelog
Added
docs/config/tools.instructions.mdas the standard template for tool configuration documentation.scripts/gather-metrics.js.Changed
scripts/verify-docs-commands.jserror reporting and doc coverage.docs/config/README.mdto reference the new template, clarify guidelines, and require validation of script references.Fixed
Removed
Risk Assessment
Risk Level: Low
Potential Impact:
Mitigation Steps:
How to Test
Prerequisites
Test Steps
docs/config/tools.instructions.mdfor completeness and clarity.node scripts/verify-docs-commands.jsagainst documentation—confirm error reports are clear and emojis are used.scripts/gather-metrics.jsand note the outlined planned features.Expected Results
Edge Cases to Verify
Checklist (Global DoD / PR)
References
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores