-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 694
Import gvisor-tap-vsock/pkg/tcpproxy
into pkg/tcpproxy
#3686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
+489
−89
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unlike bicopy.Bicopy(), this ignores errors silently. I don't think this library should be used for anything in the current state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What should we do then ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Port forwarding seems to be lima core functionality, and using a library makes it hard to get good logging, so It think the best way is to copy the missing bits from tcpproxy into our own implementation.
This may be related:
inetaf/tcpproxy#46
tcpproxy seems to be about
Our usage seems to be hacky way to reuse part of the library.
It also says:
Other options:
If nobody can own this code in lima we can use tcpproxy as a temporary quick fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no idea how big tcpproxy is, but we have copied single file implementations from other projects before:
So assuming the implementation isn't too big, I think importing it gives us the maximum flexibility going forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tcpproxy is pretty small, and we basically use one function:
https://github.com/inetaf/tcpproxy/blob/c4b9df066048ad2ab5c32235362fa94444a24ebe/tcpproxy.go#L376
In this file we use it to proxy packets between GRPC endpoint and net.Con - both are connected, so we hack the proxy DialContext function to not dial anything.
We don't need the sendProxyHeader() thing since we don't to the optional http proxy feature.
I'm not sure if the keepalive is needed for our use case, but GRPC is not a net.TCPCon so it does nothing for it.
So we are left with:
Note how the errors are dropped silently to make the user life more interesting.
proxyCopy is:
Since we don't use tcpproxy.Con, and we don't do route matching we don't need to copy buffered data.
Since GRPC endpoint is not a net.TCPConn unwrapping the underlying connection will fail, and the splice optimization will not kick in.
So we are left with:
I'm not sure how this code supports TCP half-close and bicopy does not. They seem to do the same thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue might not be relevant to tcp half-close , as this does not seem to implement half-close methods
lima/pkg/portfwdserver/server.go
Line 42 in 3bc63b6
Not sure why
tcpproxy
fixes the issue, except on WSL2 🤔