Skip to content

Conversation

@konard
Copy link
Contributor

@konard konard commented Jan 23, 2026

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive case study analyzing issue #1161, where the auto-restart mechanism with a tool agent led to committing files that were not explicitly requested by the user.

📋 Issue Reference

Fixes #1161

🔍 Problem Analyzed

When the AI tool agent completed its work session with uncommitted files (temporary research data files), the auto-restart mechanism triggered a new session that committed and pushed these files to the pull request. These files were:

  • Not part of the original requirements
  • Not explicitly requested by the user
  • Temporary research artifacts that should have been discarded

📝 Case Study Contents

The case study includes:

  1. Timeline of Events - Detailed reconstruction of what happened
  2. Root Cause Analysis - Why the auto-restart mechanism lacks discrimination between legitimate code and research artifacts
  3. 5 Proposed Solutions:
    • File classification logic
    • Auto-discard research artifacts
    • Enhanced agent prompt guidance
    • .gitignore patterns for research files
    • Discard-by-default (conservative approach)
  4. Industry Best Practices - Research from Anthropic, Block/Goose, and others on AI agent code change management
  5. Full Logs - Execution logs and PR comments for reference

📁 Files Added

docs/case-studies/issue-1161/
├── README.md                              # Main case study analysis
├── pr-9-all-comments.txt                 # PR comments from the affected repository
└── solution-draft-log-pr-9-gristwidgets.txt  # Full execution log (1.3MB)

🔗 References

✅ What's Next

This case study documents the problem and proposes solutions. Implementation of the fixes would be handled in a separate PR.

Adding CLAUDE.md with task information for AI processing.
This file will be removed when the task is complete.

Issue: #1161
@konard konard self-assigned this Jan 23, 2026
…ling

- Document timeline of events when auto-restart committed unwanted files
- Analyze root cause: lack of discrimination between legitimate code and research artifacts
- Propose 5 solutions: file classification, auto-discard, enhanced prompts, gitignore, discard-by-default
- Include full execution logs and PR comments for reference
- Research industry best practices for AI agent code change management

This case study analyzes a scenario where the auto-restart mechanism
triggered after detecting uncommitted files (temporary research data),
and the subsequent agent session committed those files instead of
discarding them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]>
@konard konard changed the title [WIP] Auto-restart with tool agent led to upload to files, that was not explicitly asked by user or requirements Add case study for issue #1161: Auto-restart uncommitted changes handling Jan 23, 2026
@konard konard marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2026 21:38
@konard
Copy link
Contributor Author

konard commented Jan 23, 2026

🤖 Solution Draft Log

This log file contains the complete execution trace of the AI solution draft process.

💰 Cost estimation:

  • Public pricing estimate: $4.814794 USD
  • Calculated by Anthropic: $2.914895 USD
  • Difference: $-1.899899 (-39.46%)
    📎 Log file uploaded as Gist (710KB)
    🔗 View complete solution draft log

Now working session is ended, feel free to review and add any feedback on the solution draft.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Auto-restart with tool agent led to upload to files, that was not explicitly asked by user or requirements

2 participants